Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Deletion of Voter Name in Cooperative Election — Election Officer Exceeded Jurisdiction by Ignoring Approved Byelaws Amendment. The court held that once the byelaws of a primary society are amended and approved under Section 13 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, the Election Officer cannot question the validity of the amendment or the membership of a nominee based on residence outside the original area.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 51
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Suresh Varpudkar, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 23.03.2015 passed by the District Cooperative Election Officer, which directed deletion of his name from the final voters list for the election to the Managing Committee of Parbhani District Central Cooperative Bank. The petitioner was a member of Savta Mali Shetkari Dhanya Adhikosh Sahkari Sanstha Maryadit, a primary society. The society adopted a resolution on 05.02.2015 to amend its byelaws to extend its area of operation to include villages Pedgaon and Panhera. The amendment was approved by the Assistant Registrar on 24.02.2015 under Section 13(1) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act. Consequently, the petitioner, a resident of Pedgaon, was nominated as a delegate of the society for the bank election. His name appeared in the provisional voters list published on 02.03.2015. Respondents 3 and 4 objected, claiming the petitioner was not a resident of the society's original area of operation (Bhogaon Sable). The Election Officer upheld the objection and deleted the petitioner's name. The High Court held that the Election Officer had no jurisdiction to go behind the approved byelaws. Once the byelaws were amended and approved, the society's area of operation included Pedgaon, and the petitioner was entitled to be a member and nominee. The court quashed the impugned order and directed the Election Officer to include the petitioner's name in the final voters list. The petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Cooperative Societies - Election - Voter List - Deletion of Name - Amendment of Byelaws - Section 13 Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - The petitioner's name was included in the provisional voters list based on a resolution of the primary society extending its area of operation, which was approved by the Assistant Registrar under Section 13(1). The Election Officer deleted the name on objection that the petitioner was not a resident of the original area. The High Court held that once the byelaws are amended and approved, the society's area of operation stands extended, and the petitioner, being a resident of the extended area, is entitled to be a member and nominee. The Election Officer exceeded jurisdiction by going behind the approved byelaws. (Paras 3-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the District Cooperative Election Officer could delete the petitioner's name from the final voters list on the ground that the petitioner was not a resident of the society's original area of operation, despite the byelaws having been amended to extend the area of operation to include the petitioner's village.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the petition, quashed the order dated 23.03.2015 passed by the District Cooperative Election Officer, and directed the Election Officer to include the petitioner's name in the final voters list. Rule made absolute with no order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Cooperative Societies
  • Election
  • Voter List
  • Byelaws Amendment
  • Area of Operation
  • Section 13 Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (BOM) (03) 11

Writ Petition No. 3454 of 2015

2015-03-27

R.M. Borde, V. K. Jadhav

Mr. M.S. Deshmukh for petitioner; Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for State; Mr. V.D. Salunke for respondent no. 2; Mr. R.N. Dhorde, Senior Counsel instructed by Mr. Vishal Bagal for respondents 3 and 4

Suresh s/o Ambadasrao Varpudkar

District Cooperative Election Officer @ Divisional Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Aurangabad & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging order of District Cooperative Election Officer deleting petitioner's name from final voters list for election to Managing Committee of District Central Cooperative Bank.

Remedy Sought

Quashment of order dated 23.03.2015 and direction to include petitioner's name in final voters list.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's name was deleted from final voters list despite byelaws amendment extending society's area of operation to include his village.

Previous Decisions

District Cooperative Election Officer passed order dated 23.03.2015 deleting petitioner's name from final voters list.

Issues

Whether the District Cooperative Election Officer can delete a nominee's name from the voters list on the ground that the nominee is not a resident of the society's original area of operation, after the byelaws have been amended and approved to extend the area.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the byelaws were amended and approved under Section 13(1) of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, extending the area of operation to include Pedgaon, and thus he was entitled to be a member and nominee. Respondents 3 and 4 argued that the petitioner was not a resident of the society's original area of operation (Bhogaon Sable) and therefore could not be a member or nominee.

Ratio Decidendi

Once the byelaws of a cooperative society are amended and approved by the competent authority under Section 13 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, the Election Officer has no jurisdiction to go behind the approved byelaws and question the membership or nomination of a person on the ground of residence outside the original area of operation.

Judgment Excerpts

The Election Officer has no jurisdiction to go behind the byelaws which have been amended and approved by the Assistant Registrar. Once the byelaws are amended and approved, the society's area of operation stands extended and the petitioner, being a resident of the extended area, is entitled to be a member and nominee.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed a writ petition on 27.03.2015 challenging the order of the District Cooperative Election Officer dated 23.03.2015. The High Court heard the matter at admission stage with consent of parties and disposed it finally.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960: Section 13, Section 13(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Deletion of Voter Name in Cooperative Election — Election Officer Exceeded Jurisdiction by Ignoring Approved Byelaws Amendment. The court held that once the byelaws of a primary society are amended and ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revision, Restores Maintenance to Wife and Child Under Section 125 CrPC — Husband's Refusal to Maintain Despite Sufficient Means and Neglect of Wife Constitutes Justifiable Ground for Maintenance. The court held that the wi...