High Court

Scroll Down To Discover

Sort by:

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Trial Court Order on Stamp Duty in Specific Performance Suit. Agreement for Sale Recognized Prior Possession, Thus Stamp Duty Payable Under Article 5(e)(ii) of Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, Not as Conveyance Under Article 5(e)(i)....

The dispute originated from a suit for specific performance of an agreement dated 23.06.2018 filed by respondent No.1 against the petitioner and others. During trial, the petitioner, as defendant No.4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition in GST Exemption Case Due to Non-Compliance with Notification Conditions. Supply of HDPE Drums to Chemical Manufacturer Does Not Qualify for Concessional Rate Under Notification No.41/2017-IT(Rate) as Goods Were Not Moved Directly to Registered Recipient or Warehouse as Required....

The petitioner, a manufacturer of packaging materials including HDPE drums, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. The pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court dismissed Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Default Bail in Criminal Breach of Trust Case. Magistrate's Order sustained as Section 409 IPC Prima Facie Applicable to Trustee, Accused not entitled to Statutory Bail Under Section 167(2) CrPC ...

The petitioner, who was the Secretary of a public charitable trust, was arrested in connection with allegations of cheating and forgery related to the sale of trust property. An FIR was registered on ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal in Co-operative Society Election Dispute Over Voter Ineligibility. Court Upholds Single Judge's Order Finding Appellant Failed to Supply Quality Milk as Per Bye-laws, with SNF Value Below 8.5% Excluding Supplies from Eligibility Calculations Under Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959....

The dispute arose from a writ appeal filed by Appellant challenging a common order dated 13.10.2025 passed by a learned Single Judge in W.P.No.27139/2024. The appellant, a member of the Tumkuru Distri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeals by Primary Milk Co-operative Societies Challenging Election Ineligibility. Eligibility to Vote in District Milk Union Elections Depends on Compliance with Bye-laws Requiring Minimum Milk Supply Under Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959....

The dispute involved several primary milk producers' co-operative societies registered under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, appealing against orders that declared them ineligible to v...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition to Quash Proceedings in Child Marriage Case Under Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006. Court held that admitted facts of marriage between a 16-year-old girl and 27-year-old man constitute child marriage under Sections 9, 10, and 11, and quashing is not permissible based on ignorance of law or marital happiness....

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a criminal petition filed by five accused persons seeking to quash proceedings in Criminal Case No.4782 of 2022 pending before the Additional Civil Judge...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Mamlatdar's Courts Act Orders Due to Procedural Defects and Lack of Substantive Findings. Tahsildar's Order Granting Way Access Under Section 5 Set Aside as Applications Failed to Specify Obstruction Details and Panchnamas Were Conducted Without Proper Notice....

The dispute concerned proceedings under the Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906 regarding access to agricultural lands. The petitioners were landowners whose lands were situated in specific survey numbers. R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court declined to quash the FIR Against Advocate in Prevention of Corruption Act Case. Settlement not applicable. The court held that the applicant, not being a public servant, could not be charged under Sections 7 and 15 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 However case of abatement made out and therefore section 12 of PC Act sustained...

The dispute arose from an FIR registered against the applicant, an advocate, for offences under Sections 7, 12, and 15 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, based on a complaint alleging he acted...