Supreme Court Disposes Contempt Petitions Against Union of India for Non-Payment of Arrears to TV News Correspondents. Court Directed Payment of Arrears by Specific Deadlines and Extended Benefits to Similarly Situated TV Assistant News Editors Without Requiring Further Court Applications.

  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from contempt proceedings filed against the Union of India for non-compliance with a previous Supreme Court judgment dated 26 September 2018, which pertained to the payment of arrears to TV News Correspondents (TVNCs) and TV Assistant News Correspondents (TVANCs). The Union of India had filed a review petition, which was dismissed on 27 January 2022, leading to the current contempt petitions and miscellaneous applications. The core legal issues involved whether the delay in filing the contempt petitions should be condoned and whether the Union of India should be directed to pay arrears to the affected employees, including extending benefits to similarly situated persons such as TV Assistant News Editors (TVANEs). The Union of India, represented by the Additional Solicitor General, submitted that arrears would be paid to the parties involved on the same footing as Mr. Sudhanshu Ranjan, who had already received payment. The court analyzed the matter, noting the dismissal of the review petition and the need for timely compliance. It reasoned that condoning the delay in filing the contempt petitions was necessary to address the substantive issues of payment. The court directed that arrears be released to the parties by 15 March 2022 and that benefits for non-parties be payable from 26 September 2018, with disbursement by 30 June 2022, without requiring further court applications. The decision disposed of the miscellaneous applications and contempt petitions, emphasizing the extension of benefits to TVANEs and ensuring compliance with the earlier judgment.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Contempt Proceedings - Delay Condonation - Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Delay in filing contempt petitions was condoned by the court to allow consideration of compliance issues with previous orders regarding payment of arrears to TV News Correspondents. Held that the delay was condoned to facilitate disposal of the contempt petitions in terms of the signed order (Paras 1, 4).

B) Employment Law - Payment of Arrears - Extension of Benefits - Not mentioned - The court directed the Union of India to release arrears to persons who were parties to the proceedings by 15 March 2022 and to extend benefits to TV Assistant News Editors similarly circumstanced, payable from 26 September 2018, with disbursement by 30 June 2022. Held that benefits should be given without waiting for other similarly situated persons to move the court, ensuring compliance with the judgment dated 26 September 2018 (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Union of India should be directed to pay arrears to TV News Correspondents and similarly situated employees as per previous court orders, and whether contempt proceedings should be disposed of upon compliance.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court condoned the delay in filing contempt petitions, directed payment of arrears to parties by 15 March 2022, extended benefits to non-parties from 26 September 2018 with disbursement by 30 June 2022, and disposed of the miscellaneous applications and contempt petitions.

Law Points

  • Contempt of court
  • delay condonation
  • extension of benefits to similarly situated persons
  • compliance with court orders
  • payment of arrears
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 Lawtext (SC) (1) 118

Miscellaneous Application No. 1717-1719/2021 in Civil Appeal No. 11948-11950/2016, Contempt Petition (C) No. 920-922/2021 in Civil Appeal No. 11948-11950/2016

2022-01-28

Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna

Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, ASG UOI, Mr. Nachiketa Joshi, Adv., Mr. Sachin Sharma, Adv., Mr. Mohd. Akhil, Adv., Ms. Deepabali Dutta, Adv., Ms. Preeti Rani, Adv., Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR, Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Sr. Adv., Mr. Uddyam Mukherjee, AOR, Mr. Navaniti Prasad Singh, Sr. Adv., Mr. K. Sriram, Adv., Ms. M.V. Rama, Adv., Mrs. Anjani Aiyagari, AOR, Mr. Ambhoj Kumar Sinha, AOR, Mr. Arun Vohra, Adv., Mr. Gaurav Dubey, Adv., Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri, AOR, Mr. Rajesh Srivastava, AOR, Mrs. Anjani Aiyagari, AOR, Mr. Snehasish Mukherjee, AOR, Mr. Sanjay Das, Adv., Mr. Ajay Choudhary, AOR

Union of India

E. Krishna Rao

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Contempt proceedings and miscellaneous applications arising from non-compliance with a Supreme Court judgment regarding payment of arrears to TV News Correspondents.

Remedy Sought

The respondents sought payment of arrears and extension of benefits to similarly situated employees, with the Union of India opposing through a review petition.

Filing Reason

Filing due to alleged non-compliance by the Union of India with the court's previous order dated 26 September 2018.

Previous Decisions

The Supreme Court had issued a judgment on 26 September 2018 regarding TV News Correspondents; a review petition filed by the Union of India was dismissed on 27 January 2022.

Issues

Whether delay in filing contempt petitions should be condoned. Whether the Union of India should be directed to pay arrears and extend benefits to similarly situated employees.

Submissions/Arguments

Union of India submitted that arrears would be paid to parties on the same footing as Mr. Sudhanshu Ranjan. Respondents sought timely payment and extension of benefits to TV Assistant News Editors.

Ratio Decidendi

Delay in contempt proceedings can be condoned to ensure compliance with court orders; benefits under a judgment should be extended to similarly situated persons without requiring further court applications to promote justice and efficiency.

Judgment Excerpts

Delay condoned in filing the Contempt Petitions. The arrears to the above set of persons shall be released on or before 15 March 2022. The benefits due to persons who were not parties to or intervenors in the proceedings which culminated in the judgment dated 26 September 2018, shall become payable on and from the judgment dated 26 September 2018. The Miscellaneous Applications and the Contempt Petitions are disposed of in terms of the signed order.

Procedural History

Contempt petitions and miscellaneous applications were filed; a review petition by the Union of India was dismissed on 27 January 2022; the court heard the matters on 28 January 2022 and issued the order condoning delay, directing payment, and disposing of the applications.

Acts & Sections

  • Contempt of Courts Act, 1971:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Protection Case on Applicability of Deposit Condition Under Old Act. The court held that the appeal is governed by the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, as the right of appeal accrued before the 2019 Act came into...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. The Court held that acquisition proceedings did not lapse under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehab...