Supreme Court Allows Transfer Petition in Hindu Marriage Act Case for Convenience and Non-Opposition. Transfer of proceedings from Gorakhpur to Bhopal granted as respondent did not oppose and it served justice, with directions for expeditious disposal under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a transfer petition filed by the petitioner-wife seeking to relocate proceedings under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 from Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh to Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh. The respondent-husband had initiated a petition under Section 9 of the Act in Gorakhpur, and the petitioner-wife, in her capacity as the wife, filed this transfer petition to move the case to Bhopal for convenience. Procedurally, notice was issued on 14.11.2018, staying the original proceedings, and subsequent orders noted service on the respondent and his non-appearance. The legal issue centered on whether the transfer should be granted under the court's discretionary powers, considering the respondent's lack of opposition and the petitioner's submissions. The petitioner argued for transfer based on convenience, while the respondent, though served, did not appear or oppose the petition, as noted in the context of pending proceedings under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The court analyzed the pleadings and submissions, concluding that the transfer request was justified due to the respondent's non-opposition and the overall circumstances. In its decision, the court allowed the transfer petition, ordering the transfer of H.M.A. No.493 of 2018 from Gorakhpur to Bhopal, with directions for expeditious disposal by 31.12.2022 and transmission of records.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Transfer of Proceedings - Convenience and Non-Opposition - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Section 25 - The petitioner-wife sought transfer of a petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 from Gorakhpur to Bhopal, citing convenience and lack of opposition from the respondent-husband, who was served but did not appear - The Court found the request justified based on pleadings and submissions, and allowed the transfer, directing expeditious disposal by the transferee court - Held that transfer is warranted when the respondent does not oppose and it serves the interests of justice (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 filed by the respondent-husband in Gorakhpur should be transferred to Bhopal at the request of the petitioner-wife

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Transfer petition allowed; H.M.A. No.493 of 2018 transferred from Gorakhpur to Bhopal; transferee court directed to decide expeditiously by 31.12.2022; records to be transmitted immediately

Law Points

  • Transfer of proceedings under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure
  • 1908
  • convenience of parties
  • non-opposition by respondent
  • expeditious disposal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (10) 109

Transfer Petition (Civil) No.1840 of 2018

2021-10-04

S. Ravindra Bhat

Shakun Srivastava

Prem Prakash Srivastava

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Transfer petition seeking relocation of proceedings under Hindu Marriage Act, 1956

Remedy Sought

Petitioner-wife seeks transfer of petition under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 from Gorakhpur to Bhopal

Filing Reason

Convenience and lack of opposition from respondent-husband

Previous Decisions

Notice issued on 14.11.2018 staying proceedings, orders dated 06.01.2020, 04.06.2020, and 18.06.2020 recorded service and non-appearance of respondent

Issues

Whether the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 should be transferred from Gorakhpur to Bhopal

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued for transfer based on convenience and respondent's non-opposition Respondent did not appear or oppose the petition despite service

Ratio Decidendi

Transfer of proceedings is justified when the respondent does not oppose and it serves the interests of justice, based on convenience and pleadings

Judgment Excerpts

This transfer petition has been filed by the petitioner-wife seeking transfer of the petition filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 by the respondent-husband Having regard to the pleadings and the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that request for transfer of proceedings is justified

Procedural History

Transfer petition filed; notice issued on 14.11.2018 staying proceedings; orders dated 06.01.2020, 04.06.2020, and 18.06.2020 recorded service and non-appearance of respondent; final order on 04.10.2021 allowing transfer

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1956: Section 9
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 125
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 25
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case Involving Permanent Disability. The Court applied multiplier of '18' for age group 15-25 years and considered future prospects of 50% of salary for a software engineer with...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Insurer's Appeal in Motor Vehicle Insurance Claim Due to Expired Temporary Registration. Driving Vehicle Without Valid Registration After Temporary Registration Expiry Constitutes Fundamental Breach of Policy Terms Under Sections...