High Court Quashes FIR in Criminal Petitions Under BNSS, 2023 Due to False Allegations of Physical Relationship on Pretext of Marriage. Petitioners Acquitted as Proceedings Deemed Abuse of Process

Sub Category: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 164
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court of Karnataka heard two criminal petitions filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeking to quash an FIR registered by Byadarahalli Police. The FIR alleged offences under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) against the petitioners, including accused No.1 and his relatives, based on a complaint by a woman claiming physical relationship on promise of marriage. The petitioners argued that the complainant was previously married twice, continued living with her second husband, and had a history of similar allegations, making the case false and an abuse of process. The complainant and State contended for investigation to proceed. The Court, after examining submissions and documents, found the allegations lacked prima facie substance and quashed the FIR to prevent abuse of process, applying legal principles similar to Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC).

Headnote

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, quashed the FIR registered for offences under Sections 3(5), 318(2), 351(2), 69, 89, 64(2)(m) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) -- The petitioners, including accused No.1 and accused Nos. 2 and 3, challenged the FIR alleging physical relationship on pretext of marriage -- The Court held that the allegations did not disclose a prima facie case, as the complainant was previously married twice and continued living with her second husband, making the promise of marriage implausible -- Applying principles akin to Section 482 of CrPC, the Court found the proceedings to be an abuse of process of law and quashed them to prevent miscarriage of justice

Issue of Consideration: The Issue of whether the FIR and complaint in Crime No.789/2024 should be quashed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, due to alleged false allegations and abuse of process of law

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the criminal petitions and quashed the FIR in Crime No.789/2024, holding that the allegations did not disclose a prima facie offence and the proceedings were an abuse of process of law

2026 LawText (KAR) (01) 46

Criminal Petition No.1225 of 2025 c/w Criminal Petition No.2826 of 2025

2026-01-19

M. Nagaprasanna J.

Sri Abhishek Kumar, Sri Punith C, Miss. Asma Kouser, Sri Akshay R. Huddar

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX

The State of Karnataka

Nature of Litigation: Criminal petitions seeking quashing of FIR under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS)

Remedy Sought

Petitioners asked the High Court to quash the FIR and complaint in Crime No.789/2024 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bangalore Rural District

Filing Reason

The petitioners alleged that the FIR was based on false allegations of physical relationship on pretext of marriage, constituting an abuse of process of law

Previous Decisions

No previous decisions mentioned; the petitions were heard and reserved for orders on 06.01.2026

Issues

Whether the FIR and complaint in Crime No.789/2024 should be quashed under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023, due to lack of prima facie case and abuse of process of law Whether the allegations of physical relationship on pretext of marriage are substantiated given the complainant's marital history

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued no physical relationship occurred, the complainant was previously married twice and continued living with her second husband, making promise of marriage implausible, and the case was an abuse of process Complainant and State argued investigation should proceed to uncover truth, as physical relationship happened on pretext of marriage while complainant was single post-divorce

Ratio Decidendi

The Court applied principles akin to Section 482 of CrPC under Section 528 of BNSS to quash proceedings where allegations lack prima facie substance and constitute abuse of process, emphasizing that false claims of physical relationship on pretext of marriage, especially with a complainant having complex marital history, warrant intervention to prevent miscarriage of justice

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioners challenge a common crime in Crime No.789 of 2024 The learned counsel for the petitioners would vehemently contend that there is no physical relationship between the petitioner and the 2 nd respondent/complainant at all The learned counsel appearing for the 2 nd respondent/complainant would vehemently refute the submissions in contending that the crime is registered only on 09-12-2024 I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made by the respective learned counsel

Procedural History

Criminal Petition No.1225 of 2025 filed by accused No.1 and Criminal Petition No.2826 of 2025 filed by accused Nos. 2 and 3 were heard together -- Reserved for orders on 06.01.2026 -- Pronounced on 19.01.2026 -- Common order issued quashing the FIR

Related Judgement
High Court High Court Quashes FIR in Criminal Petitions Under BNSS, 2023 Due to False Alleg...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court Quashes FIR Against University Vice-Chancellor in SC/ST Act Case - Te...