13 result(s) found
The appellant was convicted by the first appellate court under Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for rash and negligen...
Income Assessment: The Supreme Court held that ₹5,600 per month (assessed by the High Court) was too low. Instead, ₹7,500 per month was considered...
High Court’s assessment of contributory negligence at 25% on the deceased was set aside. Tribunal’s finding of 100% negligence on the part of the...
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 136 – Reappreciation of Evidence – Scope of interference by Supreme Court – Findings of the lower courts...
The Supreme Court reversed the Madhya Pradesh High Court's order that set aside an award by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). The appeal, bro...
The Supreme Court of India partially allowed the appeal in Muthupandi v. State, upholding the conviction under Sections 279 and 304(A) of the IPC for...
The Bombay High Court quashed the conviction and sentencing of Shivaji Santu Zanzad under Sections 279, 304(A), and 337 of the IPC for lack of conclus...
An appeal was filed challenging the Tribunal’s assessment of the deceased’s income and the calculated compensation for his family due to his untim...
Case BackgroundThe appellants, the wife and sons of deceased Silak Ram, filed an appeal for compensation after a road accident in which Silak ...
The Bombay High Court in a criminal revision application challenging his conviction for causing the death of a pedestrian due to alleged rash and negl...
