Search Results for "Consumer Protection Act, 1986"

Trending :

Search Results for "Consumer Protection Act, 1986"

99 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 99 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Insurer's Appeal in Malaria Death Insurance Claim. Death Due to Disease Not an Accident Under Section II of National Insurance Home Loan Suraksha Bima Policy.

26 Mar 2019

The case involves an appeal by the National Insurance Co. Ltd. against a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission which upheld ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds NCDRC Finding of Deficiency of Service in Hotel Swimming Pool Death — Duty of Care Owed by Hotel Management to Guests Using Pool Facilities. Assigning Lifeguard Additional Bartending Duties Constitutes Breach of Duty Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

15 Mar 2019

The appeals arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 28 April 2015, which held the Kerala Tourism De...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Consumer Complaint in Limine — Remands for Merits Hearing. The Court held that the Commission's jurisdiction to dismiss a complaint in limine under Section 13 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 must be exercised appropriately based on facts, and the present dispute required notice and merits adjudication.

7 Mar 2019

The appellant, M/s Anjaneya Jewellery, filed a consumer complaint before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission against New India Assuran...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Refund Order in Unfair Trade Practice Case, Denies Specific Performance. Forfeiture of Earnest Money Upheld Due to Buyer's Default Under Clause 10 of Plot Buyer's Agreement.

7 Mar 2019

The appellant, Sudha Gupta, filed an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002 read with Section 55 of the repealed Monopolies and Restric...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Flat Purchasers' Appeal in Consumer Dispute Against Developer for Delayed Possession — Interest Extended Until Actual Possession. The Court held that the developer cannot avoid liability for interest by denying possession due to the filing of a consumer complaint, and the contractual compensation rate was inadequate under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

11 Feb 2019

The case involves a consumer dispute between flat purchasers and a developer, Mantri Castles Pvt. Ltd., regarding delayed possession of flats in Banga...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Flat Purchasers' Appeal in Consumer Dispute Against Developer for Delayed Possession — Interest Extended Until Actual Possession. The court held that the NCDRC's limitation of interest to 31 July 2016 was unjustified as many purchasers had not received possession, and the contractual compensation rate was inadequate under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

11 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court of India heard two sets of appeals against an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 8 June 2018...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for LIC Policyholder Due to Deficiency of Service in Jeevan Aastha Plan. LIC's failure to process proposal and wrongful retention of premium for five years amounts to deficiency of service under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

4 Jan 2019

The appellant, Madhav Hari Joshi, submitted a proposal to the Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) under its Jeevan Aastha Plan on 31 January 200...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Resolves Conflict in Citizenship Rules for Assam NRC: Harmonious Construction of Sub-para (2) of Paragraph 3 and Paragraph 8 of Schedule to Citizenship Rules, 2003. Court Declines to Create Appellate Forum Under Article 142, Leaves it to Parliament and Executive.

1 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions challenging the preparation of the National Register of...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Resolves Conflict in Citizenship Rules for Assam NRC — Harmonious Construction of Paragraph 3(2) and Paragraph 8 of Schedule to Citizenship Rules, 2003. The Court held that persons declared as illegal migrants or foreigners by a competent authority are excluded from the NRC and cannot use the claims and objections process under paragraph 8 to challenge such declaration.

1 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court of India, in a batch of civil and criminal appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions, addressed the perceived conflict between su...

8 9 10

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)