Search Results for "Recovery"

291 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 291 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Undertrial Prisoner in UAPA Case After Five Years of Custody. Unjustified Delay in Trial Violates Right to Speedy Justice – SC Directs Release on Bail with Conditions.

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 21 – Right to Speedy Trial – Prolonged incarceration of an undertrial prisoner for five years without conc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquitted the Appellant Convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence and Procedural Lapses by the Trial Court.

Conviction Quashed – Appellant Acquitted – Lack of Proof of Last Seen Together – Omissions in Testimonies – Procedural Errors in Contradicting...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Conviction Reversed – Prosecution Failed to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Supreme Court Set Aside Conviction Under Section 302 and Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Deficiencies in Evidence and Delay in Witness Statements Raised Doubt – Appellant Released.

Supreme Court found material contradictions and inconsistencies in the prosecution’s case. The delay in witness statements was unexplained, raising...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Acquittal in Circumstantial Evidence Case – Conviction Set Aside

Supreme Court Held – Failure to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt – Chain of Circumstantial Evidence Incomplete – Appellant Acquitted (Par...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused Due to Lack of Conclusive Evidence. Recovery Process Flawed – Chain of Circumstances Broken – Conviction Set Aside

Circumstantial Evidence and Burden of Proof – Whether the prosecution established an unbroken chain of circumstances proving the guilt of the accuse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Acquittal in Corruption Case: Demand and Acceptance of Bratification Not Proven Beyond Reasonable Doubt

Court Sets Aside Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Defective Sanction Order Demand and Acceptance of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused Due to Doubtful Arrest and Lack of Identification. Manner of Arrest and Identification Found Unreliable – Conviction Set Aside – Appellants Acquitted.

Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 136 – Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 – Section 313 – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Sections 392, 397, 41...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Executionary Powers of District Magistrate Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 — No Obligation for Independent Inquiry or Borrower's Hearing.

The Court held that: (a) The Special Recovery Officer was duly notified via the gazette notification. (b) The District Magistrate’s function under R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashed FIR and Charge-Sheet Against Hospital Directors — Purely Civil Dispute With No Criminality Involved Tagline: No Ingredients of Cheating Established — Criminal Proceedings Termed an Abuse of Law Headnote: Acts and Sections Discussed: Constitution of India (COI) — Article 226 (Writ Jurisdiction) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) — Section 482 (Inherent Powers of High Court) Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 418 (Cheating With Knowledge), Section 420 (Cheating and Dishonest Inducement), Section 34 (Acts Done by Several Persons in Furtherance of Common Intention) Keywords:Writ Jurisdiction — Quashing of FIR — Commercial Transaction — Civil Suit — Non-Payment of Dues — Abuse of Process — No Criminal Offence Nature of the Litigation:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of FIR and charge-sheet. Petitioners’ Relief Sought:Quashing of FIR No.98 of 2020 lodged at Bhosari Police Station and the charge-sheet arising from it. Reason for Filing the Case:Allegations of non-payment of professional dues and financial aid advanced to the hospital. Prior Decisions:Special Civil Suit No.1161 of 2018 filed by the complainant for recovery of Rs.53,11,652/- was pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune. Issues:Whether the dispute between the parties was of a civil or criminal nature, and whether criminal proceedings were maintainable alongside a pending civil suit. Submissions/Arguments:(a) Petitioners: FIR related to events preceding their control of the hospital — No criminal intention or inducement established — Civil suit already instituted for the same financial claims. (b) Respondents: Civil and criminal proceedings can proceed simultaneously — Alleged WhatsApp messages demonstrated promises to clear dues. Decision:FIR and charge-sheet quashed — Court held that the case was purely civil in nature, with no elements of cheating or criminality — Proceedings deemed an abuse of process of law. Ratio:No criminal offence was made out against the petitioners — Allegations of non-payment related to a period before the petitioners took control of the hospital — Civil remedy already sought by the complainant — No dishonest inducement proven as required under Sections 415 and 420 of IPC. Relevant Paragraphs:Paras 9, 10, and 11 of the judgment outline the court’s rationale for quashing the FIR and charge-sheet.

FIR and charge-sheet quashed — Court held that the case was purely civil in nature, with no elements of cheating or criminality — Proceedings deem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Permitted the Plaintiff to Produce Balance Sheets and Email Correspondence Despite Delay — Emphasized Reasonable Cause for Non-Disclosure and Lack of Prejudice to the Defendants

Commercial Summary Suit — Production of Additional Documents Allowed Subject to Costs The Court allowed the production of additional documents, not...