Search Results for "IBC"

109 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 109 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Bona Fides of Insolvency Proceedings by Telecom Service Providers to Avoid AGR Dues. The Court held that AGR dues are final and no fresh disputes can be raised, and directed examination of whether insolvency proceedings under IBC are a subterfuge.

The Supreme Court was hearing applications in the ongoing AGR dues matter, where the Union of India sought extension of time for payment. The Court ha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Section 7 Case — NCLT Cannot Dismiss Petition Without Applying Mind to Merits. Adjudicating Authority Must Determine Default and Admit or Reject Petition Under Section 7, Not Direct Settlement Without Considering Individual Claims.

The present appeal under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) arises from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Limitation Dispute — Application Under Section 7 Held Barred by Limitation. Acknowledgment of Debt in Balance Sheets Does Not Extend Limitation for Initiating CIRP Under IBC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Babulal Vardharji Gurjar, a director of Veer Gurjar Aluminium Industries Pvt. Ltd., against the order of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Trade Union to File as Operational Creditor Under IBC — Workers' Dues Constitute Operational Debt. Trade Union, Being a Body Corporate Under Trade Unions Act, Can Represent Workmen Collectively for Insolvency Proceedings.

The appeal arose from a long-standing dispute concerning a jute mill that had been closed permanently on 07.03.2014. The appellant, JK Jute Mill Mazdo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCLAT Order for Violation of Natural Justice in IBC Section 7 Proceedings. The Court held that failure to serve notice under Rule 48 of NCLAT Rules, 2016, vitiated the proceedings and remanded the matter for fresh hearing.

The appeal arose from an order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 08.02.2019, which set aside the order of the National Comp...