Search Results for "precedent"

1619 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1619 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in U.P. Excise Act Interest Dispute, Holding Licensee Liable for Interest Despite Interim Stay. Interest on Arrears of Excise Revenue is Payable Under Section 38A of U.P. Excise Act, 1910, as Interim Stay Only Suspended Recovery Without Nullifying Statutory Obligation.

The dispute arose from the respondent's license for retail sale of country liquor in Uttar Pradesh for the year 2002-03. The respondent applied for su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses SEBI's Appeal in Securities Market Violation Case Due to Absence of Question of Law. Tribunal's Factual Findings on Advertisements, Manipulation, and Natural Justice Upheld, with Jurisdiction Under Section 15Z of SEBI Act, 1992 Confined to Legal Issues.

The dispute arose from a statutory appeal under Section 15Z of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, filed by SEBI against the Securit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against High Court Direction for Regularisation of Contractual Employees. Contractual Appointments in Temporary Project Units Do Not Confer Right to Absorption, and Service Period Under Interim Orders Must Be Excluded from Regularisation Claims.

The dispute arose from the State of Gujarat's appeal against a High Court judgment directing consideration of contractual employees for regularisation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeals in Service Law Dispute Over Career Progression Schemes. Employees Governed by Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme, 2009 Retrospectively as Eligibility Under Assured Career Progression Scheme, 1999 Does Not Create Vested Right.

The dispute arose between the Union of India and its employees regarding the applicable career progression scheme. The employees, working as Junior En...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Sentence Modification in Court-Martial Case. General Court Martial Composition Violated Army Rules, 1954, Rule 40(2) and Rule 102, but Armed Forces Tribunal's Sentencing Discretion Under Section 71(e) of Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 Upheld.

The dispute arose from disciplinary proceedings against a retired Lieutenant General of the Indian Army, initiated after an anonymous complaint in 200...