Search Results for "scrutiny"

619 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 619 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Customs Authorities in Classification Dispute Over Imported Goods as High Speed Diesel. Goods Classified as Prohibited High Speed Diesel Under Customs Tariff Act, 1975, Leading to Confiscation and Penalties Under Customs Act, 1962.

The dispute centered on the classification of imported goods by three appellant companies, who declared them as Base Oil under Chapter Heading 2710196...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Service Dismissal Case, Reinstating Dismissal Order Quashed by High Court. The Court Held That Approval of Charge-Sheet by Competent Authority at Issuance Stage Is Not Mandatory If Initiation of Proceedings Was Approved, Under Civil Services Rules and Precedents.

The dispute arose from the dismissal of a civil service officer in Jharkhand following disciplinary proceedings for misconduct involving dishonesty, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Lack of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 Overturned as Witness Testimonies Were Inconsistent and Failed to Inspire Confidence.

The appeal arose from a murder conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, where the appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility Criteria for Food Safety Officers: Master’s Degree in Relevant Subjects Valid for Appointment. Court Rules in Favor of Appellants, Quashes High Court’s Decision on FSO Qualifications

The term “degree” under Section 22(3) of the UGC Act includes Bachelor’s, Master’s, and Doctorate degrees, and any restriction to exclude Mast...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCDRC Order : No Privity of Contract Between Parties, Respondent Not a ‘Consumer’ Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Court Holds No Tripartite Agreement Proven, Respondent Not Entitled to Compensation Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Privity of Contract Essential for Consumer Status: The Court reiterated that for a person to qualify as a ‘consumer’ under the CPA, t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in TADA Case Due to Procedural Lapses in Recording Confessional Statements. Confessions Under TADA Act Deemed Inadmissible Due to Non-Compliance with Safeguards

Procedural Safeguards under TADA Act: The Court emphasized that confessions recorded under Section 15 of the TADA Act must strictly comply with the p...