Search Results for "writ petitioner"

407 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 407 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Recovery of Excess Payments from In-Service Nursing Trainees Under Restitution Principle. Recovery Permitted as Payments Were Made Pursuant to Court Order Later Set Aside, Distinguishing Mistaken Payment Guidelines Under Rafiq Masih Case for Class III and IV Employees.

The dispute originated from in-service employees of the Rajasthan Medical & Health Subordinate Service, working as ANMs, Lab Technicians, and similar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Adverse Remarks and Costs Against Tax Officer in UP VAT Act Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. High Court's Findings on Ex Parte Assessment and Service of Notice Upheld, but Ancillary Strictures and Penalties Set Aside for Lack of Hearing Opportunity.

The Supreme Court addressed appeals by a tax officer challenging adverse observations, remarks, and costs imposed by the High Court of Judicature at A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in U.P. Excise Act Interest Dispute, Holding Licensee Liable for Interest Despite Interim Stay. Interest on Arrears of Excise Revenue is Payable Under Section 38A of U.P. Excise Act, 1910, as Interim Stay Only Suspended Recovery Without Nullifying Statutory Obligation.

The dispute arose from the respondent's license for retail sale of country liquor in Uttar Pradesh for the year 2002-03. The respondent applied for su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against High Court Direction for Regularisation of Contractual Employees. Contractual Appointments in Temporary Project Units Do Not Confer Right to Absorption, and Service Period Under Interim Orders Must Be Excluded from Regularisation Claims.

The dispute arose from the State of Gujarat's appeal against a High Court judgment directing consideration of contractual employees for regularisation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Review Order in Service Dispute Due to Lack of Reasoning. Review Jurisdiction Requires Speaking Order Demonstrating Error Apparent on Face of Record Under Order 47 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The dispute originated from a writ petition filed by an employee challenging his superannuation order and seeking continuation in service until age 62...