Search Results for "Consumer protection"

32 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 32 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Earnest Money Forfeiture – Contractual Obligations – One-Sided Agreements – Consumer Protection

Forfeiture Clause – Valid But Limited to 10% of BSP – Contractual forfeiture of 20% BSP was excessive – Courts can interfere with unfair and one...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds LPG Distributorship Allotment Despite Allegations of Land Disqualification. Alternative Land Offered Due to Shifting Stance of Lessor – No Disability in Application – Allotment Process Upheld.

Land Disqualification – No Violation Found: The Court found no evidence that the 4th Respondent’s land offer violated guidelines – Field verific...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Orders Refund to Homebuyer in Vatika India Next Project - Consumer Protection Act Applies to Plot Allotment Despite Arbitration Clause - Deficiency in Service Established for Delayed Possession

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission allowed a consumer complaint filed by Complainant( s) against Opp.Party(s) for deficiency in servi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Full Insurance Claim Despite Delay in Intimation, Condones Exclusion Clause Application. "Reasonable conduct under compelling circumstances negates insurer's denial of claim."

The Supreme Court of India upheld the State Commission’s award of the entire Insured Declared Value (IDV) of Rs. 5,02,285/- with 9% interest to the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Consumer Commission Orders after 28 Years of Litigation. A protracted dispute over a plot allotment highlights procedural irregularities and judicial overreach in granting relief.

The Supreme Court quashed the orders of the State and National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions granting possession of a plot after 28 years. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Bombay High Court Orders Insurance Company to Pay Award with Interest and Costs, Fixes Accountability for Harassment" Landmark judgment enforcing accountability on public sector insurance officials for non-compliance with Ombudsman awards.

The Bombay High Court adjudicated on two connected writ petitions involving an insurance dispute between Bharat Hirji Dedhia and Oriental Insurance Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCDRC Decision; Affirms No Medical Negligence by Doctor in Ptosis Surgery. Confirming that complications alone do not establish negligence, the Court restores the State Commission's dismissal of the complaint for lack of evidence of negligence.

The Supreme Court set aside the NCDRC’s decision awarding compensation to a minor patient for alleged medical negligence in a ptosis surgery perform...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCDRC Judgment on Delay in Possession: Balancing Interests of Allottee and Developer "Supreme Court affirms NCDRC's order for refund with interest, recognizing delays from both parties; upholds jurisdiction and considers absence of completion certificate."

The Supreme Court addressed appeals arising from a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) judgment concerning a housing dispute. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCDRC Order for Refund in Real Estate Dispute: Emphasizes Consumer Rights. Real Estate Developer Ordered to Refund Over ₹7 Crore with Interest; NCDRC's Decision on Consumer Status and Deficiency in Service Affirmed.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by a real estate developer challenging the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) order, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Compensation for Delayed Possession in Fiesta Homes Project. The Supreme Court mandates compensation for homebuyers, correcting NCDRC's oversight of the construction agreement's possession date.

The appellants, along with proforma respondents, filed a complaint against the first respondent-builder for delay in handing over possession of flats ...