Search Results for "Contractual Employee"

Trending :

High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application Challenging Rejection of Plaint ...
Supreme Court Allows Subsidy Claim Under National Horticulture Board Scheme Due ...
Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Illegal Sand Mining Case Involving Wi...
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in Eviction Case and Remands to Trial ...
Supreme Court Quashes Charge Against Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to ...

Search Results for "Contractual Employee"

15 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pension Dispute Over Contractual Service Counting. Services Rendered as Casual/Contractual Cannot Be Treated as Temporary for Qualifying Service Under Rule 13 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, Absent Statutory Scheme Provision.

24 Mar 2023

The dispute arose from a claim for pensionary benefits by an employee who served as a casual/contractual General Assistant from 1985 until her regular...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partly Allows Employer University's Appeal in Service Regularization Case, Modifying Consequential Benefits. Court Restricts Actual Financial Benefits to Three Years Prior to Writ Petition Filing, While Granting Notional Regularization and Continuity from Date Similarly Situated Employees Were Regularized, to Balance Equities and Reduce Financial Burden.

28 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from the employer University's appeal against the High Court's judgment and order directing regularization of services with all cons...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against High Court Direction for Regularisation of Contractual Employees. Contractual Appointments in Temporary Project Units Do Not Confer Right to Absorption, and Service Period Under Interim Orders Must Be Excluded from Regularisation Claims.

24 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from the State of Gujarat's appeal against a High Court judgment directing consideration of contractual employees for regularisation...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partly Allows Employer's Appeal in Industrial Dispute by Modifying Reinstatement Order to Lump Sum Compensation. Termination of Contractual Employee Found in Breach of Sections 25-F and 25-G of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, but Reinstatement with Back Wages Deemed Inappropriate, Leading to Award of Rs. 3,00,000 Compensation.

31 Jan 2022

The dispute originated from the termination of a sweeper employed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) on a contractual basis w...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Seniority and Promotion Rights in Service Regularization Dispute - Continuity of Service Entitles Counting of Retrenched Period for Promotion Without Monetary Benefits Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

31 Jan 2022

The dispute originated from the appointments of the respondents as Assistant Managers on contract in 2000, which were regularized in 2006 under the Ke...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)