Bombay High Court Quashed Termination Notice Due to Unfair and Arbitrary Action
25 Feb 2025Contract Law – Judicial Review – Public Law Element – Principles of Fairness and Reasonableness – Article 14 of the Constitution of India The...
40 result(s) found
Contract Law – Judicial Review – Public Law Element – Principles of Fairness and Reasonableness – Article 14 of the Constitution of India The...
The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeals, setting aside the Madras High Court’s directions in paragraphs 22(iv), (v), (vi), and (vii) of its...
The Supreme Court held that the exemption under the Notification applies only to lands up to 25 cents and cannot be extended to larger holdings. The ...
The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal, holding that HUDCO was in breach of its contractual obligations and ordered a refund of the principal amo...
Constitution of India (COI) — Article 226 — Writ Jurisdiction — Civil Court’s Exclusive Authority on Title Disputes Maharashtra Ownership Fla...
Forfeiture Clause – Valid But Limited to 10% of BSP – Contractual forfeiture of 20% BSP was excessive – Courts can interfere with unfair and one...
The High Court considered two writ petitions filed over the payment of salary and service conditions of a lecturer employed by a minority institution....
Arbitration Scope: The Court clarified the restrictive jurisdiction under Section 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, emphasizing minim...
The Bombay High Court set aside the Appellate Court’s decision to reduce the contractual rent of the premises from ₹2,000 to ₹1,000 per month, r...
1. Background Disputes arose regarding ownership and specific performance of agreements for Flats Nos. 901, 902, 1001, and 1002 in Mangal Kunj, "B"...
