Search Results for "DTC"

17 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Vehicle Accident Claim, Restoring Compensation Based on Income Tax Returns. Income Tax Returns and Audit Reports Held Reliable Evidence for Determining Loss of Income Under Section 168 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Overturning High Court's Use of Notional Income.

The Supreme Court heard a civil appeal arising from a motor vehicle accident claim. The deceased, a businessman aged above 31 years, died in a collisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Multiplier Application. Compensation Enhanced as Multiplier Must Be Based on Age of Deceased, Not Split Methodology, Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The legal heirs of deceased V. Rajasekaran appealed against a compensation order by the High Court of Judicature at Madras dated 7.11.2017, which gran...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Land Owner's Appeal in Consumer Case, Holding No Joint Liability for Developer's Default. Collaboration Agreement and Tripartite Agreement Did Not Impose Obligation on Land Owner to Flat Buyers Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) allowing a complaint by flat buyers against a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Exclusion of Unauthorised Absence from Qualifying Service for Pension in DTC VRS Cases. The court held that period of absence without authorisation cannot be counted towards qualifying service for pension under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, even if employee availed VRS.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) against the respondents, ex-employees who had availed of the Vol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit and Recruitment Interval Rules for Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. Rules 8(1) and 12 of UPHJS Rules, 1975 Held Valid as Not Manifestly Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 16.

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Rules 8(1) and 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The petitioner...