Search Results for "Order 23 Rule 3"

12 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Purchaser Against High Court Decision That Compromise Decree Does Not Bind Coparceners. Property Reacquired by Coparceners Through Court Decree Retains Joint Family Character, Requiring Consent of All Coparceners for Valid Compromise Under Hindu Law.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal against the High Court's judgment which declared that a compromise decree dated 25 March 1976, entered into betw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Execution Proceedings: Consent Decree Enforceable Despite Absence of Formal Decree. The Court held that a consent order under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC is a decree and executable even without a formal decree being drawn.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the appellant, Sir Sobha Singh And Sons Pvt. Ltd., against the judgment of the Delhi High Court. The dis...