Search Results for "Order VII Rule 11"

42 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 42 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Commercial Appeal by Appellant Against Order Rejecting Return of Plaint Application -- Maintainability Under Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and CPC -- Jurisdiction Dispute in Commercial Suit

The High Court dismissed a commercial appeal filed against an order rejecting an application under Order VII Rule 10 of CPC seeking return of plaint o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Waqf Act Jurisdiction Dispute - Tribunal Lacks Jurisdiction For Non-Notified Properties, Civil Court Retains Authority For Property Status Determination.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Appellants against Respondents, setting aside the High Court order and allowing the application under Or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Rejects Plaint in Money Recovery Suit - Applicant Application Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Succeeds -Plaintiff' Suit Barred by Maharashtra Money Lending Act Due to Unlicensed Lending

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard an interim application filed by the defendant under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Affirmed Maintainability of Suit for Negative Declaration of Marital Status

Declaration of Legal Character – Suit Seeking Negative Declaration – Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 – Jurisdiction of Civil Courts ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

The Court Held That the Plaintiff Deserved an Opportunity to Adduce Evidence, and the Rejection of the Plaint Could Not Be Sustained Solely on the Ground of Absence of a Clear Right to Sue.

Bombay High Court Dismissed Civil Revision Application of Applicant Challenging Rejection of Application for Plaint Rejection. The Court held that a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Rejection of Plaint – Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) – Limitation and Cause of Action – Requirement of Evidence at Trial.

The High Court upheld the Trial Court’s decision, stating that the issues of limitation and cause of action required detailed examination through ev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds HUDCO in Breach of Contractual Obligations, Orders Refund of Forfeited Amount to Tomorrowland Limited. Forum Shopping and Unclean Hands Doctrine Bar Interest on Refund – Appeal Partly Allowed

The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal, holding that HUDCO was in breach of its contractual obligations and ordered a refund of the principal amo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Upholds Restoration of Suit for Specific Performance Despite Initial Procedural Dismissal: Cause of Action Distinction Under Order II Rule 2 CPC Clarified" "Procedural bars must yield to substantive justice when causes of action in separate suits are distinct."

1. Delay Condonation and Leave Granted The Supreme Court condoned the delay in filing the Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) and granted leave to appea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Decides on Election Petition Challenging 18th Lok Sabha Results from Mumbai North-West Constituency. Justice Amidst Narrow Margins: Upholding the Electoral Process

The Bombay High Court examined the maintainability of an election petition under the Representation of People Act, 1951, challenging the election resu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Conditional Guarantee Found Inoperative in Absence of CDR Approval. No life to a contract where pre-conditions remain unmet, rules Bombay High Court.

The suit revolves around whether the Deed of Guarantee executed by the plaintiff, Mr. Deepen Arun Parekh, became operative. The court held that the gu...