Search Results for "Pain and Suffering"

17 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court upholds enhanced compensation for 100% functional disability with focus on 'pain and suffering.'

This case centers on the quantum of compensation for an accident victim, K.S. Muralidhar, who sustained life-altering injuries resulting in 100% funct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation for Motor Accident Victim to ₹52,31,000/- Considering 100% Functional Disability and Future Prospects. The Court increased the compensation from ₹30,99,873/- to ₹52,31,000/- due to the appellant's 100% functional disability and future medical and attendant needs.

This judgment arises from a Special Leave Petition (SLP) where the appellant, a victim of a motor vehicle accident, sought enhancement of compensation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Tribunal Judgment. Seeking justice for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident through enhanced compensation for non-pecuniary losses.

Appeal against a judgment and award issued by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal in 2013. The appellant seeks enhanced compensation for injuries sustai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Enhances Compensation in Road Accident Case. Supreme Court Increases Compensation for Victim from Rs. 1.27 Lakhs to Rs. 2.42 Lakhs, Citing Misjudgment in Disability Assessment.

The Supreme Court enhanced the compensation awarded to a road accident victim, recognizing errors in the lower courts' assessment of the victim’s di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Compensation Enhancement for Accident Victims in Motor Vehicle Act Claims. Future Medical Expenses Enhanced Based on Precedent and Multiplier, While Other Claims Rejected as High Court's Award Deemed Fair and Reasonable Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The dispute involved two appellants who suffered severe injuries in a motor vehicle accident on 22.08.2012, resulting in permanent disabilities of 95%...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Consumer Complaint, Reducing Compensation for Deficiency in Hair Styling Services. Deficiency in Service Upheld as Factual Finding, but Compensation of Rs.2 Crores Set Aside as Excessive and Unsupported by Evidence Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeal arose from an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in a consumer complaint filed by the respondent against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Claimant's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Enhanced Compensation. Compensation for Pain and Suffering and Loss of Amenities Increased Due to Severe Brain Injuries and Permanent Coma Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the claimant, a 29-year-old process supervisor, sustained grievous brain injuries in an accident on...