Search Results for "Recruitment Rules"

32 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 32 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bias vs. Fair Hearing – Supreme Court Restores Shiksha Karmi Appointments Due to Procedural Infirmities

Constitution of India, 1950 Article 14 – Right to equality – Violation of procedural fairness – Absence of notice and opportunity to be heard �...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Eligibility for Craft Instructor Posts: Bombay High Court Upholds Inclusion of Degree Holders. Higher qualifications presumed to include foundational qualifications unless expressly excluded.

The Bombay High Court ruled on the eligibility criteria for Craft Instructor posts advertised by the Directorate of Vocational Education and Training,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Bombay High Court Declares Rejection of MSRTC Divisional Controller Candidate Unjustified" "Court quashes cancellation of selection process; orders MSRTC to appoint petitioner as Divisional Controller within three months."

  Eligibility Criteria Clarified: The Court emphasized that an advertisement for recruitment must explicitly state all required qualifications and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Rejects Appointment of Shikshan Sevak Due to Non-Compliance with Recruitment Rules. Rule 9(2-A) of MEPS Rules ensures transparency and equal opportunity in teacher recruitment.

  Case Context:The petition challenged an order rejecting the appointment of Smt. Pooja Yogesh Singh as a Shikshan Sevak in a minority education...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Promotion Delayed Beyond Superannuation Cannot Yield Financial Benefits. Rule of Law Prevails: Right to be Considered for Promotion Does Not Grant Entitlement to Retrospective Benefits Without Assumption of Duties.

1. Background Parties Involved: Appellants: Government of West Bengal and its agencies. Respondent: Dr. Amal Satpathi, a retired Principal Sc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Promotion Dispute Decided on "Seniority-Cum-Fitness" Principle. Bombay High Court emphasizes seniority in promotional disputes, barring further merit assessments once minimum fitness is proven.

The High Court of Bombay addressed a writ petition filed by Smt. Shweta Takalgavankar challenging the promotion of a junior, Smt. Asha Bagul, to the p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Bihar Junior Engineer Recruitment Process; Orders Fresh Selection. Bihar Government’s Recruitment Process for Junior Engineers Cancelled; Supreme Court Directs Revised Merit List with AICTE-Exempt Universities.

The Supreme Court held that the eligibility criteria requiring AICTE approval for universities were contrary to established legal principles. It ruled...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Recruitment Rules of 2015, Dismisses Petition Challenging RFO Seniority List. Petitioners' reliance on superseded 1998 Rules and failure to include all affected parties lead to dismissal; seniority list validated under 2015 Rules.

The petitioners challenged the seniority list based on the Recruitment Rules of 1998, arguing against the application of the Recruitment Rules of 2015...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Central Government's Discretion in Voluntary Retirement Case of IPS Officer. Central Government's Authority Affirmed in Assessing Disciplinary Matters and Rejecting Voluntary Retirement Amid Serious Charges

The petitioner, an IPS officer, challenged the Central Government's refusal to accept his voluntary retirement due to pending disciplinary proceedings...