Search Results for "Section 11 application"

Trending :

High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application Challenging Rejection of Plaint ...
Supreme Court Allows Subsidy Claim Under National Horticulture Board Scheme Due ...
Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Illegal Sand Mining Case Involving Wi...
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in Eviction Case and Remands to Trial ...
Supreme Court Quashes Charge Against Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to ...

Search Results for "Section 11 application"

18 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order in Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act Case Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Over Third-Party Rights. The competent authority under Section 5A of the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 exceeded its jurisdiction by granting deemed conveyance of property not covered by flat purchase agreements, affecting appellant's rights allotted under a dissolution deed.

21 Apr 2025

The dispute arose from a partnership firm dissolution in 1987, where a larger plot was partitioned between Lalbhai H. Shah (predecessor of respondents...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Clarifying Jurisdiction Requirements Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court Held That Service of Section 21 Notice and Inclusion in Section 11 Application Are Not Prerequisites for Arbitral Tribunal to Exercise Jurisdiction Over a Person, and Impleadment is Based on Being Party to Arbitration Agreement.

17 Apr 2025

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 01.06.2012 between the appellant and respondent no. 1 to form a Limited Liability Partnership (respondent no...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCDRC Order : No Privity of Contract Between Parties, Respondent Not a ‘Consumer’ Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Court Holds No Tripartite Agreement Proven, Respondent Not Entitled to Compensation Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986

20 Mar 2025

Privity of Contract Essential for Consumer Status: The Court reiterated that for a person to qualify as a ‘consumer’ under the CPA, t...

High Court

Arbitration Award Set Aside – Fresh Arbitration Permissible. Supreme Court’s Observations on Merits Do Not Bar Fresh Arbitration – Section 11 Application Allowed

11 Mar 2025

Arbitration Award Set Aside – The Arbitral Award was set aside by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court under Section 37 of the Arbitration a...

Supreme Court

Upholding Autonomy Amidst Settlement Disputes Exploring Legal Principles and Precedents in Arbitration Law

18 Jul 2024

This Judgment pertains to a legal discussion surrounding arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, particularly focusing on the re...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Landowner's Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Development Agreement Validity. Clause 18 of Development Agreement Held as Valid Arbitration Agreement Under Section 7 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Reversing High Court's Dismissal of Section 11 Application.

7 Sep 2022

The dispute originated from a Development Agreement dated 29.05.2014 between the appellant landowner and respondent developer for construction of an a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Calcutta High Court's Order Appointing Arbitrator Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Territorial Jurisdiction for Section 11 Application Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Depends on Court as Defined in Section 2(1)(e), Not Merely on Seat Designation in Arbitration Clause.

24 Mar 2022

The appeals arose from orders of the Calcutta High Court dated 13 August 2021 and 4 October 2021. The appellant and respondent had entered into a deve...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Cantonment Board's Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Dispute. Limitation period for Section 11 application under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 runs from date of refusal to appoint arbitrator, not from request date, under Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963, and no claim certificate does not extinguish arbitration clause.

15 Mar 2021

The dispute arose from three contracts dated 23.09.2000 and 17.09.2001 between Secunderabad Cantonment Board (appellant) and M/s B. Ramachandraiah & S...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)