Search Results for "delay in FIR"

21 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 21 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Acquittal in a Sensitive POCSO Case: Evidence and Procedure Questioned. Presumption under POCSO rebutted due to foundational gaps in evidence.

1. Background: The appellant, Sikandar Somsingh Chavhan, was convicted for rape under Section 376(2)(l) IPC and Sections 3, 4, 5(k), and 6 of the POC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Reduces Applicant's Sentence in Rash Driving Case; Exonerated of Stalking Charges. Accused receives 36-day imprisonment for rash and negligent driving but cleared of stalking charges under IPC Section 354D.

The Bombay High Court revised the sentencing in a criminal revision application. Applicant was initially convicted for offenses under Sections 279, 35...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"High Court Upholds Conviction in Heinous Gang Rape Case: Admissibility of Electronic Evidence Challenged" "Bombay High Court affirms the life imprisonment of two accused, focusing on electronic evidence and delay in the victim’s report."

1. Introduction and Case Background: Facts: The appellants were convicted for gang rape under Sections 376(2)(g), 366A, 292, 500, and 506 (II) of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court upholds 20-year rigorous imprisonment for appellant convicted under Section 376-AB of IPC and the POCSO Act, 2012, in a case involving an 8-year-old victim.

The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal of Gajanan More, who was convicted under Section 376-AB of the IPC and Sections 4, 6, and 8 of the POCSO Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

FIR Quashed in Dowry Death Case as Deceased's Death Found to be Natural in USA. Section 482 CrPC invoked; Court rules no evidence of dowry harassment or unnatural death.

(Para 1):Title & Case:The applicants sought to quash FIR No. 391/2020 dated 14.08.2020 under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 r/w 34 IPC, and a charg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Acquittal in POCSO Case: Court Cites Doubts in Evidence and Delayed FIR. Bombay High Court’s Nagpur Bench quashes 20-year conviction, citing inconsistencies, delayed report, and lack of corroborative evidence.

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akola, for sexual offences under the POCSO Act and Indian Penal Code (IPC), including Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash FIR in Case Involving Alleged False Promise of Marriage Leading to Rape. Court Upholds FIR Against Petitioner, Emphasizing the Distinction Between False Promise to Marry and Breach of Promise, Citing Misconception of Fact in Consent.

The High Court dismissed a petition seeking to quash criminal proceedings against the petitioner accused of rape and other offenses. The petitioner ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Landmark Legal Analysis: Reporting Obligations in Seizure Orders. Navigating the Legal Landscape of Seizure Reporting: An In-Depth Examination and Clarification

Presents an appeal case stemming from an impugned order dated 09.08.2023, wherein the High Court of Madras allowed the claim of the Respondents-accuse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder Case Based on Child Witness Testimony. Conviction under Sections 148 and 302 read with Section 149 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 sustained as child witness demonstrated intelligence and minor identification discrepancies did not affect reliability.

The appeal involved accused nos. 9, 2, and 1 challenging their conviction under Section 148 and Section 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping Case Due to Insufficient Evidence and Doubtful Victim Testimony. Conviction under Sections 366, 342 and 506 IPC Set Aside as Victim's Conduct Suggested Possible Elopement and Lack of Maltreatment During Alleged Kidnapping Period.

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by an accused challenging his conviction under Sections 366, 342 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for ki...