Search Results for "delay in trial"

22 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bail Granted on Grounds of Speedy Trial in Cross-Complaint Case Applicant released on bail after three years of incarceration, citing violation of his right to a speedy trial.

Acts and Sections Discussed: Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439 (Bail in Non-bailable Cases) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 302, 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Appellant in Money Laundering Case Amidst Delay in Trial. "Extended Pre-Trial Detention Raises Article 21 Concerns Over Right to Liberty and Speedy Trial."

The Supreme Court case of V. Senthil Balaji vs. The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, the Court granted bail to the appellant, V. Senthil B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bail Denied under Section 437(6) CrPC: Discretionary Power Exercised, Not a Default Right. Trial delay does not grant automatic bail under Section 437(6) of CrPC. Courts must exercise discretion based on facts and circumstances.

The applicant sought bail under Section 437(6) of the CrPC, claiming that the trial was not concluded within 60 days from the first date fixed for evi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Sheikh Javed Iqbal After Nine Years of Detention. Prolonged Incarceration Without Trial Progress Violates Fundamental Rights, Emphasizes Right to Speedy Trial

The Supreme Court has granted leave and heard arguments in an appeal against an order denying bail to Sheikh Javed Iqbal, accused of possessing counte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused in NIA Case Due to Long Incarceration and Delay in Trial. Right to Speedy Trial Under Article 21 Prevails Over Statutory Bail Restrictions Under Section 43D(5) UAPA When Trial Cannot Be Completed in Reasonable Time.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Ashim @ Asim Kumar Haranath Bhattacharya, accused no. 6 in a case investigated by the National Investigation A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Dishonour of Cheque Case, Reinstates Proceedings Quashed by High Court. Parallel Prosecutions Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Other Offences Are Permissible, and Settlement Agreement Does Not Extinguish Liability Unless Full Payment Is Made.

The dispute arose from dishonoured cheques issued by Aanchal Cement Limited (ACL) to Gimpex Private Limited. Gimpex had paid customs duty and wharfage...