Search Results for "extraordinary power"

54 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 54 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act Due to Insufficient Material. Single Criminal Case Under Prohibition Act Found Inadequate to Establish Prejudice to Public Order Under Sections 2(b) and 3 of the Act.

The case involved a challenge to a preventive detention order passed against the detenue under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act Due to Insufficient Material. Detention Authority Failed to Demonstrate How Alleged Activities Affected Public Order as Required Under Section 2(c) of the Act, Making Subjective Satisfaction Illegal.

The case involved a petition challenging a preventive detention order passed under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985. The det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act Due to Insufficient Impact on Public Order. Detention Based on Five Criminal Cases Under Section 304(2) BNS Found Inadequate to Establish Prejudice to Public Order Under Section 2(c) of the Act.

The case involved a petition challenging a preventive detention order passed under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985. The det...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal and Dissolves Marriage on Ground of Irretrievable Breakdown Using Article 142 Powers. Marriage Found Completely Broken Down with No Emotional Connection Between Parties, Warranting Dissolution Despite Earlier Withdrawn Petitions Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal concerning the dissolution of marriage between parties who had married on February 14, 2000. The appellant had ...