Search Results for "joint trial"

20 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Summoning Order in PMLA Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. Special Court in Ghaziabad Lacked Jurisdiction as Money-Laundering Offence Allegedly Committed in Maharashtra, Under Section 44(1) of Prevention of Money-laundering Act, 2002.

The dispute arose from a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India challenging a summoning order issued by the Special Judge, Anti-C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in TADA Case Due to Involuntary Confession and Lack of Corroboration. Confession recorded under Section 15 of TADA Act found not voluntary as guidelines in Kartar Singh were not followed, and confession of co-accused not admissible without joint trial.

The appellant, Raja @ Ayyappan, was convicted by the Designated Court under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in NDPS Case: Summoning Under Section 319 CrPC After Conviction Is Impermissible. The power under Section 319 CrPC can be exercised only before the pronouncement of judgment; once the trial concludes and judgment is pronounced, the court becomes functus officio.

The Supreme Court of India heard two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had dismissed crimina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Discharge Accused in Fake Currency Case. Prima Facie Evidence of Involvement Found Sufficient for Trial Under Sections 489B and 489C IPC.

The appellant, Dipakbhai Jagdishchandra Patel, was implicated in a case involving the possession and sale of counterfeit Saudi Arabian Riyal currency ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit for Clubbing Properties in Different Jurisdictions. Section 17 CPC Does Not Permit a Single Suit for Separate Immovable Properties Situated in Different States.

The appeal arose from a civil suit filed by the appellant (plaintiff) seeking declaration that two properties—one in Indore, Madhya Pradesh, and ano...