Search Results for "memorandum of understanding"

52 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 52 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCDRC Order : No Privity of Contract Between Parties, Respondent Not a ‘Consumer’ Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Court Holds No Tripartite Agreement Proven, Respondent Not Entitled to Compensation Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Privity of Contract Essential for Consumer Status: The Court reiterated that for a person to qualify as a ‘consumer’ under the CPA, t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Overturns Madras High Court’s Directions on Formula 4 Racing Event Funding and State Responsibility. Public-Private Partnership in Sports Events Upheld; State’s Role in Facilitating Events Clarified

The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeals, setting aside the Madras High Court’s directions in paragraphs 22(iv), (v), (vi), and (vii) of its...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Deemed Conveyance Under Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 (MOFA) — Civil Court Jurisdiction in Title Disputes — Quasi-Judicial Authority’s Scope — Premature Application for Deemed Conveyance

Constitution of India (COI) — Article 226 — Writ Jurisdiction — Civil Court’s Exclusive Authority on Title Disputes Maharashtra Ownership Fla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court's Landmark Decision on Valuation Under Central Excise Act, 1944: Bharat Petroleum vs. Commissioner of Central Excise" "Defining Transaction Value in the Sale of Petroleum Products Between Public Sector Undertakings Under the Central Excise Act."

The judgment clarifies the determination of "transaction value" under Section 4(1) of the Central Excise Act for sales made between public sector oil ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Arbitration Clause Rendered Ineffective After Sale Deed Execution, Rules Bombay High Court “Mere historical reference to an Agreement doesn’t sustain arbitration rights if the contract has ceased to exist.”

The case revolves around whether disputes arising out of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and related documents, which lacked a specific arbitratio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Arbitration Battle Over Ganatra Hotels: Panchamias vs. Ganatra Group. Complex Dispute Involving Share Transfers, Valuation Discrepancies, and Legal Contentions Reaches Judicial Review

This case involves two connected Commercial Arbitration Petitions arising from an Arbitral Award dated 5th April 2016. The primary parties are the Pan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Mandates Medical Facilities in Maharashtra Educational Institutes. Petition Over Student's Death Spurs Directives for Improved First Aid and Emergency Care in Colleges

The court addressed a petition regarding the death of Tejuswini, a final-year diploma student at a polytechnic college, alleging negligence by the col...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Quashes State Decision to Shift Navi Mumbai Sports Complex, Reaffirms Public Interest. Judgment emphasizes the importance of accessible sports facilities, criticizes arbitrary land reallocation for commercial use, and mandates CIDCO to hand over land for the original sports complex.

The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenges the allocation of land originally designate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

State Government’s Shift of Sports Complex to Rural Area Quashed. Court Orders CIDCO to Revert Land for Sports Complex Development, Emphasizing Public Interest and Transparency

The State Government's decision to relocate the Government Sports Complex from Navi Mumbai to a rural area for commercial exploitation has been critic...