Search Results for "one-time settlement"

17 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Protection Case, Reversing NCDRC's Dismissal on Consumer Status. Overdraft Facility Availed by Stockbroker for Business Qualifies as Consumer Service Under Exception for Self-Employment Livelihood in Section 2(1)(d)(ii) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissing a consumer complaint on the ground that the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against High Court's Mandamus to Consider OTS Application. Court Holds That No Writ of Mandamus Can Be Issued to Direct a Bank to Grant One Time Settlement Benefit Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The present appeal arises from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court which, in exercise of powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, iss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses CBI Appeal Against Quashing of Criminal Proceedings in Bank Fraud Case Following Civil Settlement. Full Settlement of Civil Dues and No Surviving Criminality Justified Quashing Under Section 482 CrPC.

The appeals were filed by the CBI against the judgment of the Delhi High Court quashing criminal proceedings in CBI Case No. RC.4(A)/94CBI/BSC/DLI aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remands Case to High Court for Fresh Adjudication in Loan Dispute Between Financial Corporation and Borrower. Consent Settlement Does Not Bar Examination of Actual Liability; High Court Must Decide on Merits.

The case involves a dispute between Punjab Financial Corporation (appellant) and M/s Paulbro Leathers Pvt. Ltd. (respondent) regarding a loan taken by...