Search Results for "proof of demand"

Trending :

Search Results for "proof of demand"

15 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 15 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Public Servant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Demand and acceptance of illegal gratification proved through shadow witness testimony and recovery of bribe money, satisfying the sine qua non requirement under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

17 Mar 2023

The case involved an appeal against conviction of a public servant for offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellant, an Inspec...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Sub-Registrar in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Proven Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. The court found that the prosecution established beyond reasonable doubt the demand of Rs.500 as gratification and the acceptance during a trap, under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

17 Mar 2023

The dispute involved a criminal appeal against the conviction of a Sub-Registrar under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellant, holding ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Unproven Demand and Doubtful Evidence. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, was set aside as the prosecution failed to establish demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt, with a tax exemption notice served before the alleged demand rendering it improbable.

21 Feb 2022

The dispute involved an appeal against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, where the appellant, a Commercial Tax Officer, was acc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act cannot be sustained when primary evidence of demand is absent due to complainant's death and no other reliable evidence establishes demand.

28 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of Mrs. Neeraj Dutta, an LDC in Delhi Vidyut Board, who was convicted under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with Sec...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Unproven Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. The prosecution failed to establish foundational facts of demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, as key witnesses were not examined and recordings were inaudible.

25 Mar 2014

The appeal arose from a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, where the accused, an Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, was alleg...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)