Search Results for "Service Rules"

216 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 216 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in IMTRAT Allowance Parity Case. High Court's Clarification on Parity Between Bhutan Compensatory Allowance and Foreign Allowance Upheld as Within Scope of Original Order.

The case involves a dispute over compensatory allowances payable to Indian Military Training Team (IMTRAT) personnel posted in Bhutan. The IMTRAT pers...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Mandamus Directing Finalization of RPF as Organized Service. In-Principle Approval by DoPT Was Conditional and Subject to Cadre Review Committee Approval, Which Was Not Granted.

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India against judgments of the Delhi High Court that had directed the governmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Company Secretary for Lack of Requisite Experience. Experience as Management Trainee or Assistant Company Secretary Cannot Be Counted as Experience 'as' Company Secretary for Eligibility.

The appellant, Ritu Bhatia, applied for the post of Company Secretary with Central Railside Warehouse Company Limited, which required five years' post...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit and Recruitment Interval Rules for Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. Rules 8(1) and 12 of UPHJS Rules, 1975 Held Valid as Not Manifestly Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 16.

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Rules 8(1) and 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Rajasthan State Sports Council in Promotion Dispute. Held that promotion criteria applicable as on date of consideration, not vacancy year, under Rule 9(4) of Rajasthan State Sports Council Service Rules, 2006.

The case involves a dispute over promotion to the post of Sports Officer in the Rajasthan State Sports Council. Respondent No. 1, Uma Dadhich, was app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal in Disciplinary Matter: Non-Supply of Inquiry Report Before 1990 Not Fatal; Disagreement Reasons Must Be Communicated. The Court restored punishments of reversion and removal from service imposed on a bank employee for gross negligence and fraud.

The Supreme Court dealt with two appeals by the State Bank of India against a common High Court order that set aside disciplinary punishments imposed ...