Search Results for "Fraudulent"

262 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 262 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Bank's Dismissal of Employee in Disciplinary Proceedings for Fraud and Misconduct. Disciplinary Proceedings Evaluated on Preponderance of Probabilities, Not Criminal Standards, Under Bipartite Settlement and Evidence Act Provisions.

The dispute arose from the dismissal of a bank employee following departmental proceedings initiated by the appellant-Bank, a nationalized entity, aga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case Under Trade Marks Act, 1999. Registered Trademark 'RENAISSANCE' Found Infringed by 'SAI RENAISSANCE' Due to Deceptive Similarity and Transborder Reputation Under Section 29(4).

The appeal arose from a trademark infringement dispute between an appellant-plaintiff, a global hotel chain incorporated in Delaware, USA, and respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Bond Redemption Dispute, Upholding Defendant's Compliance with RBI Directives. Interest on Delayed Payment Not Payable Due to Regulatory Embargo and Pending Liquidation Proceedings Under Companies Act, 1956.

The dispute arose from a suit filed by M/s. SIBCO Investment Pvt Ltd against Small Industries Development Bank of India seeking interest on alleged be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Decree Granting Letters of Administration in Will Dispute. Will Proved in Accordance with Law, No Suspicious Circumstances Found Under Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and Section 63 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The case involves a dispute over the estate of E. Srinivasa Pillai, who died on 19th January 1978. The plaintiffs, C. Saradambal (widow of the testato...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case on Jurisdictional Grounds. Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34 as Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Exclusive Authority Over Securitisation Matters, Despite Allegations of Fraud in Assignment Agreement.

The dispute arose from a loan agreement dated 26.07.2011, where the appellant acted as a guarantor for a corporate debtor. After the corporate debtor ...