Search Results for "Articles 14 and 21"

31 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 31 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Inter-Commissionerate Transfers for Inspectors Under Recruitment Rules 2016. Recruitment Rules Made Under Article 309 of the Constitution Prevail Over Executive Instructions, and ICTs Are Not Permissible as They Violate Separate Cadre Identity Under Rule 5.

The dispute arose from a batch of civil appeals filed by Inspectors of the Central Excise and Land Customs or Goods and Services Tax Administration, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Bihar Government Notification Granting Scheduled Tribe Status to Lohar Community as Unconstitutional - State Lacks Authority Under Article 342 of Constitution to Specify Scheduled Tribes, Causing Violation of Fundamental Rights Under Articles 14 and 21.

The dispute involved a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution filed by four petitioners challenging a notification issued by the Governmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Interim Bail Granted by High Court in MCOCA Case, Condemns Forum Shopping. The Court held that granting bail in a writ petition challenging vires of MCOCA provisions, after withdrawal of a regular bail application, amounts to impermissible forum shopping.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by the State of Maharashtra against an interim order of the Bombay High Court granting bail to the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Interim Application for Rohingya Refugees in Deportation Case. Court upheld government's authority under Foreigners Act, 1946, citing national security concerns and precedent of similar dismissed application, while directing that deportation must follow prescribed procedure.

The Supreme Court considered an interlocutory application filed by Mohammad Salimullah and another, who identified as Rohingya refugees from Myanmar, ...