Search Results for "Borrower"

90 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 90 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition, Quashes DRAT Order Imposing Pre-deposit on Tenant Under SARFAESI Act -- Petitioner, Neither Borrower Nor Guarantor, Not Required to Deposit 40% for Appeal -- Appeal Revived and Restored for Merits Consideration Without Pre-deposit

The Petitioner, a tenant in a redeveloped building, challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai (DRAT, Mumbai) that required h...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Dispute - Heirs of Appellant Fail to Restore Permanent Injunction Decree - Appellate Court's Modification of Injunction Upheld Under CPC

The High Court dismissed a Second Appeal in a land dispute case where the appellants sought restoration of a Trial Court decree granting permanent inj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Civil Land Dispute Due to Absence of Substantial Question of Law. Appellate Court's Factual Findings on Possession and Evidence Appreciation Upheld as Not Perverse Under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The dispute concerned agricultural land in Survey No.517 at village Chitroda, where the appellants (original plaintiffs) sought permanent injunction a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Facilitates Settlement in Consumer Dispute Involving Flat Buyers, Builder, and Bank Under Consumer Protection Act. Court Records Amicable Resolution Terms Including Waiver of Charges, Interest Discounts, and Payment Adjustments, Directing Compliance with Timelines.

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, against a common judgment of the National Consumer Dispute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCDRC Order : No Privity of Contract Between Parties, Respondent Not a ‘Consumer’ Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Court Holds No Tripartite Agreement Proven, Respondent Not Entitled to Compensation Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Privity of Contract Essential for Consumer Status: The Court reiterated that for a person to qualify as a ‘consumer’ under the CPA, t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case, Upholds Jurisdiction Under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Bank’s Right to Choose Jurisdiction for Cheque Dishonour Cases Upheld – Transfer Denied Under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ...