Search Results for "Cooperative society"

58 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 58 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Cooperative Society Redevelopment Case on Jurisdiction and Limitation Grounds. Civil Court Maintainability Upheld Under Section 91 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, and Suit Found Within Limitation with Possible Section 14 Benefit.

The dispute arose from a redevelopment project involving a Cooperative Society registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Cooperative Court’s Order on Guarantor Liability and Limitation. Court Upholds Cooperative Court’s Decision on Guarantor Liability Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 – Limitation Period Under Section 92(1) Applicable

Jurisdiction of Cooperative Court: Under Section 91(1)(d) of the MCSA, a dispute against sureties and nominal members of a cooperative society is main...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Joining a Member of a Housing Society as a Party in Unauthorized Construction Dispute. A cooperative society member has a locus standi to challenge unauthorized construction by another member if it impacts common rights.

The Bombay High Court allowed the impleadment of a cooperative housing society member as a defendant in a suit challenging unauthorized construction b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Challenge Against Lokayukta’s Direction on Payment Dispute Quashed by Court. Lokayukta’s jurisdiction and natural justice questioned; Cooperative Society's resolution challenged; Civil courts left to decide inheritance rights.

The petition challenged the Lokayukta’s order dated 6 December 2019, directing the cooperative society (Respondent No.2) to withhold payments for su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Frivolous Arbitration Petition in Redevelopment Dispute. Court criticizes misuse of Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act by the developer, imposes costs for vexatious litigation.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by a developer against a cooperative ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court rules in favor of the Appellant/Plaintiff, setting aside compensation to private Defendants, upholding ownership of suit property in Metro Rail Project case.

The Supreme Court delivered its judgment in the case involving the ownership of the suit property situated in Sy. No. 305/2 in Kempapura Agrahara vill...