Search Results for "DRC"

95 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 95 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India – Civil Appellate Jurisdiction – Consumer Protection Act, 2019 – Limitation Period – Continuing Cause of Action – Error on Face of Record – Substantive Right Over Procedural Technicality – NCDRC Order Quashed and Set Aside.

Consumer Protection Act, 2019 – Section 67 – Limitation Period to File Complaint – Continuing Cause of Action Upheld – NCDRC's Dismissal on Li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India Ruled on the Definition of ‘Consumer’ Under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 in Loan Transactions

The Apex Court Held That a Borrower of a Project Loan Does Not Qualify as a ‘Consumer’ When the Loan is Availed for Commercial Purposes The Supre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Claim Repudiation — Non-Disclosure of Material Facts — Substantial Disclosure — Prudent Insurer Test — Reinstatement of Insurance Benefits with Interest

The Supreme Court held that the non-disclosure of additional policies did not amount to material suppression because the disclosed policy itself had a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Earnest Money Forfeiture – Contractual Obligations – One-Sided Agreements – Consumer Protection

Forfeiture Clause – Valid But Limited to 10% of BSP – Contractual forfeiture of 20% BSP was excessive – Courts can interfere with unfair and one...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Orders Refund to Homebuyer in Vatika India Next Project - Consumer Protection Act Applies to Plot Allotment Despite Arbitration Clause - Deficiency in Service Established for Delayed Possession

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission allowed a consumer complaint filed by Complainant( s) against Opp.Party(s) for deficiency in servi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside NCDRC Decision; Affirms No Medical Negligence by Doctor in Ptosis Surgery. Confirming that complications alone do not establish negligence, the Court restores the State Commission's dismissal of the complaint for lack of evidence of negligence.

The Supreme Court set aside the NCDRC’s decision awarding compensation to a minor patient for alleged medical negligence in a ptosis surgery perform...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCDRC Judgment on Delay in Possession: Balancing Interests of Allottee and Developer "Supreme Court affirms NCDRC's order for refund with interest, recognizing delays from both parties; upholds jurisdiction and considers absence of completion certificate."

The Supreme Court addressed appeals arising from a National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) judgment concerning a housing dispute. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds NCDRC Order for Refund in Real Estate Dispute: Emphasizes Consumer Rights. Real Estate Developer Ordered to Refund Over ₹7 Crore with Interest; NCDRC's Decision on Consumer Status and Deficiency in Service Affirmed.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by a real estate developer challenging the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) order, which ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Dispute over Transferable Development Rights and Incentive Benefits under Development Control Regulations.

The case involves Bholenath Developers Ltd. challenging the denial of additional Transferable Development Rights (TDR) benefits by the Municipal Corpo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Directs Compensation for Delayed Possession in Fiesta Homes Project. The Supreme Court mandates compensation for homebuyers, correcting NCDRC's oversight of the construction agreement's possession date.

The appellants, along with proforma respondents, filed a complaint against the first respondent-builder for delay in handing over possession of flats ...