Search Results for "Prosecution"

655 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 655 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Complete Chain of Circumstances, Particularly with Recovery of Gold Chain Lacking Corroboration.

The appeal arose from a conviction under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, where the appellant was sentenced to life imprisonment for murder...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Divorce Appeal on Ground of Cruelty, Overturning Family Court Dismissal. Husband Established Mental Cruelty Under Section 13(1)(i-a) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Through Wife's Abnormal Behavior, Public Humiliation, and Physical Violence, Despite Withdrawal of Unsoundness of Mind Ground.

The appeal arose from a divorce petition filed by the husband against the wife under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, on grounds of cruelty and unsoundne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Order Declining Approval Under Prevention of Corruption Act Due to Non-Application of Mind. The Court held that an order under Section 17A must reflect independent consideration and cannot be based solely on exoneration in a departmental enquiry, directing fresh reconsideration.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a lawyer and social activist challenging an order dated 26-05-2025 passed by the Under Secretary, Depa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Atrocities Act Offences. Conviction upheld based on complete chain of circumstantial evidence including motive, recovery of weapons, and FSL reports under Sections 302 and 201 IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST POA Act, 1989.

The appeal arose from a conviction by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gadag, in Special SC/ST Case No.9/2021. The appellant was convicted ...