Search Results for "Section 24(2)"

39 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 39 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Delhi Development Authority's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Declaration of Lapse. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as Possession Was Taken and Compensation Released, Despite Illegal Occupation by Encroachers.

The dispute arose from a land acquisition case in Delhi, where the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) appealed against a High Court judgment that decla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Quashing High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013 When Possession Could Not Be Taken Due to Court Stay, and Stay Period Must Be Excluded from Five-Year Computation.

The dispute originated from land acquisition proceedings initiated under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The respondent landowner filed a writ petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Case, Reversing High Court's Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Did Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 as Possession Was Taken, Satisfying Only One of Twin Conditions Required for Deemed Lapse.

The Supreme Court heard an appeal by the Delhi Development Authority against a judgment of the Delhi High Court which had declared that land acquisiti...