Search Results for "Tariff"

37 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 37 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Orders MSEDCL to Refund Excess Charges to Consumers Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. found in violation of MERC orders; Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum directs refunds with interest.

The consolidated petitions, involving orders passed by the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum (CGRF) in individual complaints against the Maharashtra ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Upholds Industrial Tariff for Manufacturing Activity in Electricity Tariff Dispute. Appellate Authority's Decision Affirmed; R&D Activity Categorized as Manufacturing, No Unauthorized Use of Electricity Found

The petition challenges an order from the Appellate Authority under the Electricity Act which determined the tariff category for the respondent’s ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Rules in Favor of Importer in Crude Palm Oil Customs Duty Dispute. High Court Cites Supreme Court Precedent, Orders Refund of Additional Duties Paid Due to Reassessment Based on Newly Issued Tariff Notification

The petitioner imported 12,250 metric tons of Crude Palm Oil under four contracts with Just Oil & Grain Pte. Ltd., Singapore. After the goods arri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Directs Cash Refund: Writ Petitions Grant Relief on CENVAT Credit. Judgement rules in favor of petitioners, mandates cash refund under Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 for excess duty payments.

Writ Petition Outcome captures the essence of the court's decision to grant relief based on the interpretation of Section 142(3) of the CGST Act, 2017...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Legal Battle Over Reliability Charge: Electricity Distribution Company Faces Setback in Tribunal Appellate Tribunal dismisses appeal, ruling against imposition of reliability charge on bulk consumers.

The imposition of a reliability charge by an electricity distribution company, the appellant, on bulk consumers like a steel industry, the first respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Affirms CESTAT's Ruling: Labelling Constitutes Manufacturing under Central Excise Law. The Supreme Court clarifies the interpretation of "manufacture" under Note 3 of Chapter 18 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, supporting the respondent's cenvat credit claim.

The Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether labelling goods amounts to "manufacture" under the Central Excise Tariff Act. The case revolved aroun...