Search Results for "order of merit"

Trending :

Search Results for "order of merit"

28 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 28 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellants in Reservation Eligibility Dispute Under Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000. Appellants, originally from unified Bihar and residing in Jharkhand post-reorganisation, are entitled to Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe/Other Backward Classes reservation benefits in Jharkhand as ordinary residents, not migrants, under Articles 341(1) and 342(1) of the Constitution and Sections 23, 24, 73, 74 of Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000.

19 Aug 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions challenging a High Court of Jharkhand judgment dated 24th February...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Resolution on Seniority of District Judges Promoted Through Limited Competitive Examination. Merit-Based Seniority Upheld as Administrative Committee's Decision Contravened Supreme Court Directives and Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Services Rules, 1994.

12 Aug 2021

The dispute concerned District Judges in Madhya Pradesh who were appointed to the Higher Judicial Services through Limited Competitive Examinations (L...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in Admission Dispute, Upholds Statutory Entrance Test Requirement but Protects Existing Admissions Under Article 142. High Court's mandamus directing B.Tech admissions based on qualifying exam marks was contrary to Section 3(1) of Odisha Professional Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission and Fixation of Fees) Act, 2007, but Supreme Court invoked Article 142 to not disturb admissions of 835 students already granted due to Covid-19 hardship.

29 Jun 2021

The appeal arose from an order of the Division Bench of the High Court of Orissa dated 21 January 2021, which allowed a writ petition filed by the Ori...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Relegation of BAS Officer to Education Service Without Hearing — Violation of Natural Justice in Compliance of Court Order. The Court held that an order with adverse civil consequences cannot be passed without affording an opportunity of hearing, and the earlier court order did not authorize wholesale revision of the select list.

17 Nov 2020

The petitioner, Subhash Kumar, was selected through the 45th Combined Competitive Examination conducted by the Bihar Public Service Commission and app...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Direct Recruits' Appeal in Seniority Dispute with Departmental Promotees — Rules That Date of Selection, Not Appointment, Determines Seniority Under Rule 27 of Rajasthan Commercial Taxes Subordinate Services Rules, 1975. The Court found that the department deliberately accelerated the DP recruitment process to give them an unfair advantage, which was mala fide and impermissible.

24 Jan 2020

The case involved a dispute over seniority between direct recruits (DRs) and departmental promotees (DPs) for the post of Tax Assistants in the Rajast...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Deputy Collectors in Seniority Dispute Over Late Passing of Departmental Examination. The court held that seniority of direct recruits is determined by the order of merit in the selection list, not by the date of confirmation or passing of departmental examination, under Rule 12(1)(a) of the Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (General Conditions of Service) Rules, 1961.

1 Jan 2020

The case involves a dispute over seniority among Deputy Collectors in Madhya Pradesh. The appellant, Warad Murti Mishra, was selected by the Madhya Pr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against Regularisation of Daily Wage Employee. Appointment Was on Daily Wage Basis, Not Regular Selection Under Rule 22 of Subordinate Offices Ministerial Staff (District Recruitment) Rules 1985.

12 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which had directed regularis...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit and Recruitment Interval Rules for Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. Rules 8(1) and 12 of UPHJS Rules, 1975 Held Valid as Not Manifestly Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 16.

29 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Rules 8(1) and 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The petitioner...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)