Search Results for "unreasonable"

305 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 305 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Retrospective Enhancement of Retirement Age in Service Regulations Case. High Court Exceeded Judicial Review Limits by Ordering Retrospective Effect from 2002 for Age Enhancement Under UP Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 and NOIDA Regulations, 1981.

The dispute arose from the enhancement of the retirement age for employees of the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) from 58 to 60 yea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Accused in Murder Case, Restoring Acquittal Due to Unjustified Interference by High Court. High Court's Reversal of Acquittal Under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC Set Aside as Trial Court's View Was Plausible and Not Perse Under Principles of Section 378 Cr.P.C.

The dispute arose from a criminal appeal before the Supreme Court of India, where the appellant, an accused in a murder case, challenged the High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Judgment in Tender Dispute, Reinstates Award to Lowest Bidder. The High Court exceeded its jurisdiction by substituting its interpretation of tender conditions for that of the tendering authority, violating principles of judicial review under administrative law.

The dispute arose from a Tender Call Notice dated 30.12.2019 issued by the Office of the Superintendent, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reinstates FIR in Assault Case Against Police Inspector, Quashing High Court's Premature Dismissal. High Court Erred in Quashing FIR Under Sections 332 and 353 IPC During Ongoing Investigation Without Considering Medical Injury Report and Assuming Counter-Blast Without Evidence.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal challenging the Rajasthan High Court's order quashing FIR No.217 of 2006. The appellant, a police constable, ha...