Search Results for "direct recruits"

42 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 42 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court Resolution on Seniority of District Judges Promoted Through Limited Competitive Examination. Merit-Based Seniority Upheld as Administrative Committee's Decision Contravened Supreme Court Directives and Madhya Pradesh Higher Judicial Services Rules, 1994.

The dispute concerned District Judges in Madhya Pradesh who were appointed to the Higher Judicial Services through Limited Competitive Examinations (L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Service Law Seniority Dispute, Overturning High Court Reliance on Per Incuriam Precedent. Seniority of Assistant Engineers Must Be Counted from Date of Regularization Under Uttar Pradesh Regularisation Rules, 1979 and 1989 Rules, Not from Initial Ad Hoc Appointments.

The Supreme Court of India, in a civil appellate jurisdiction, addressed a group of appeals concerning the seniority determination of Assistant Engine...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Impleadment Applications by IPS Officers in Central Armed Police Forces Recruitment Rules Case. Impleadment Denied as Applicants Lacked Direct Legal Interest and Were Not Necessary Parties Under Order I Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The Supreme Court dealt with interlocutory applications filed by Indian Police Service officers seeking impleadment in special leave petitions arising...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Ex-Servicemen's Appeal in Seniority Fixation Case Under Punjab Civil Service Rules. Appellants Not Entitled to Military Service Benefits Under Repealed 1972 Rules as Appointment Made Under 1982 Rules After Advertisement Issued Post-Enforcement.

The dispute involved ex-servicemen appellants who were appointed to the Punjab Civil Service (Executive Branch) in 1986 after being released from the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit and Recruitment Interval Rules for Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. Rules 8(1) and 12 of UPHJS Rules, 1975 Held Valid as Not Manifestly Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 16.

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Rules 8(1) and 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The petitioner...