Search Results for "Section 15"

510 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 510 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remands Electricity Theft Case to High Court for Fresh Consideration Under Section 152 of Electricity Act, 2003. Settlement in Lok Adalat does not automatically quash FIR; compounding provisions must be examined.

The appellant, Mukesh Chand, was a consumer of electricity who obtained a connection from BSES Rajdhani Power Limited for his business premises. BSES ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals and Remands Tax Settlement Case to Settlement Commission for Fresh Determination on Waiver of Interest. High Court's Modification of Settlement Commission Order Set Aside for Lack of Jurisdiction.

The appeals arose from a dispute between Kakadia Builders Pvt. Ltd. and its promoter director (appellants/assessees) and the Income Tax Officer and Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Section 15J Factors Illustrative in SEBI Penalty Adjudication. Adjudicating Officer Retains Discretion to Consider Mitigating Circumstances Beyond Stipulated Factors Under SEBI Act.

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a reference arising from multiple civil appeals concerning the interpretation of Section 15J of the Securities ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in TADA Case Due to Invalid Sanction — Prior Sanction Under Section 20A(2) TADA Must Show Application of Mind. The Designated Court's finding of non-application of mind in sanction order was upheld, and the prosecution could not proceed under TADA.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of three respondents by the Designated Judge, Jamnagar, in Special TADA Case Nos.3/1994, 3/1997, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Upholds Vesting of Land in State and Rejects Ownership Claim. The Court held that the plaintiffs failed to prove their title and that the suit was barred by res judicata and limitation.

The case involves a dispute over land bearing No.73, Canal Circular Road, Calcutta, which was part of a larger parcel of land. The plaintiffs, claimin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remands Case to High Court for Fresh Hearing Due to Inconsistent Order and Lack of Reasons in Injunction Dispute. The High Court's order granting injunction to both parties was set aside as it failed to consider that the plaintiff's injunction application was not appealed.

The appellant, Shri Revansiddeshwar Pattan Sahakari Bank Niyamit, was defendant No. 2 in a civil suit filed by respondent No. 1, Taluka Tokrekoli (Amb...