Search Results for "refund"

579 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 579 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Sales Tax Reimbursement Case — Coal and Coke Held Not Same Goods Under Section 15(b) of Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Reimbursement of State Tax on Coal Not Available When Inter-State Sale Is of Coke, Despite Both Being Declared Goods Under Section 14.

The State of Jharkhand and its officers appealed against a High Court judgment directing them to reimburse the respondent, M/s. Akash Coke Industries ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Class Action in Consumer Dispute Over Non-Delivery of Commercial Units. The Court Held That Sameness of Interest, Not Identical Cause of Action, Is Required for Class Action Under Section 12(1)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dismissing a complaint filed by 44 appellants under Section 12...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revision Petition in Consumer Execution Proceedings. Holds that Execution is Continuation of Consumer Dispute Under Section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The present Civil Appeal arose out of execution proceedings initiated by the Respondent-Complainant, K. A. Nagamani, against the Appellant, Karnataka ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Additional Evidence in Consumer Dispute Over Occupancy Certificate and Conveyance Deed. The Court held that documents coming into existence after the appeal must be considered under Order XLI Rule 27 CPC if relevant and not producible earlier despite due diligence.

The present civil appeal arose from a consumer dispute between the appellants (developers) and the respondent (cooperative housing society). The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by UP Housing Board, Sets Aside NCDRC Order Directing Allotment of Flat at Rs 2,50,000. Mere Registration Under Housing Scheme Does Not Confer Right to Allotment; Consumer Forum Cannot Compel Public Authority to Enter into Contract at Arbitrary Price.

The appellant, UP Housing and Development Board, floated a scheme for Economically Weaker Sections in 1982. The respondent deposited Rs 500 in 1982 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Cost Escalation by Development Authority in Consumer Dispute — Clause 7 of Allotment Letter Permitted Price Revision. The Court held that the allotment was not a fixed price contract and the authority acted fairly by granting interest on deposits.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 8 November 2017, which had directed the Visakhap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Flat Booking - Reduction of Booking Amount to 15% Upheld as Valid Novation. Developer's Failure to Execute Agreement and Cancellation of Allotment Amounts to Deficiency of Service Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The dispute arose from a residential apartment booked by the appellants, Suman Jindal and another, with the respondent developer, M/s. Adarsh Develope...