Search Results for "Central Excise"

69 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 69 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Valuation Case Due to Incorrect Adoption of Highest Price. Valuation Must Be Based on Most Conservative Price Under Rule 6(b)(i) of Central Excise Rules, 1994, as Per Precedents on Normal Wholesale Cash Price.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal filed by the revenue against an order of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remands Excise Dispute to High Court for Comprehensive Adjudication on Natural Justice and Statutory Validity Issues. High Court Erred in Limiting Decision to Vires of Section 9-D Without Applying Principles to Department's Actions Under Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944.

The appeals arose from a judgment and order dated 28th August 2009 by the Delhi High Court, which disposed of five writ petitions challenging actions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute Over All-in-One Desktop Computers. Goods Classified as Portable Under Tariff Item 8471 30 10 Based on Weight and Transportability, Affecting Duty Valuation Under Central Excise Act, 1944.

The Supreme Court of India addressed an appeal concerning the classification of Automatic Data Processing Machines, specifically All-in-One Integrated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Manufacturer's Appeal in Trade Tax Exemption Case Under U.P. Trade Tax Act. Exemption Denied as New Product Not Considered Different in Nature Under Diversification Scheme Under Section 4-A(5) of U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948.

The dispute arose from an appeal by a manufacturer against the denial of trade tax exemption under Section 4-A(5) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Secured Creditor's Appeal in Priority Dispute Between SARFAESI Act and MSMED Act. SARFAESI Act's Express Priority Provisions Under Section 26E Prevail Over MSMED Act's Recovery Mechanism, as No Conflict Exists and Priority Must Be Expressly Provided.

The dispute arose from conflicting recovery claims under the SARFAESI Act and MSMED Act against a debtor, Mission Vivacare, which had defaulted on loa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Sabka Vishwas Scheme Case Due to Moratorium Under IBC. Payment Delay Caused by Legal Disability Under Section 14 IBC, Designated Committee Directed to Accept Payment and Issue Discharge Certificate Under Finance Act, 2019 Scheme.

The dispute arose from the appellant company's inability to pay a settlement amount of Rs.1,24,28,500/- under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolu...