Search Results for "Consumer Protection Act"

Trending :

High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application Challenging Rejection of Plaint ...
Supreme Court Allows Subsidy Claim Under National Horticulture Board Scheme Due ...
Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Cognizance in Illegal Sand Mining Case Involving Wi...
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order in Eviction Case and Remands to Trial ...
Supreme Court Quashes Charge Against Accused in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to ...

Search Results for "Consumer Protection Act"

85 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 85 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Protection Case, Reversing NCDRC's Dismissal on Consumer Status. Overdraft Facility Availed by Stockbroker for Business Qualifies as Consumer Service Under Exception for Self-Employment Livelihood in Section 2(1)(d)(ii) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

22 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissing a consumer complaint on the ground that the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Telecom Service Provider Jurisdiction - Section 7B of Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 Does Not Bar Consumer Forums from Adjudicating Disputes with Private Service Providers Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

16 Feb 2022

The civil appeal originated from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dated 26 May 2016, which affirmed the juris...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Protection Case on Applicability of Deposit Condition Under Old Act. The court held that the appeal is governed by the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, as the right of appeal accrued before the 2019 Act came into force, and the deposit of ₹50,000 under Section 23 suffices for entertaining the appeal.

15 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from an order of the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission directing the appellant to pay a substantial sum with interest. T...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Defendant in Commercial Suit to File Written Statement Despite Expiry of 120-Day Limit Due to COVID-19 Disruptions. Time Limit Under Proviso to Order VIII Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 as Substituted by Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Extended Considering Orders in Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 and Administrative Curtailment of Court Functioning.

14 Feb 2022

The dispute arose from a commercial suit filed by the plaintiff-respondent against the defendant-appellant for recovery of Rs. 3,73,24,821/- with inte...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Consumer Complaint Against Postal Authorities in Kisan Vikas Patra Fraud Case. Postal authorities not vicariously liable for agent's fraud as payment was made to holder under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and appellants' negligence in signing instruments contributed to loss.

7 Feb 2022

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by Pradeep Kumar and Raj Rani against postal authorities, including the Post Master General and othe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in MRTP Act Case Upholding Commission's Finding of No Unfair Trade Practices. The Court Held That Extra Charges and Cancellation of Apartment Allotment Were Contractual and Did Not Constitute Unfair Trade Practices Under Sections 36-A and 36-B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969.

25 Jan 2022

The appeal arose from a judgment dated 19.01.2009 by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, New Delhi, which dismissed a complaint...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Delayed Possession and Refund. The court upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's order for refund with interest, rejecting the developer's argument that possession delivery period should start from Fire NOC date under the Apartment Buyers Agreement, as construction had commenced earlier.

21 Jan 2022

The appeals arose under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 from the decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission on co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Bank's Wrongful Crediting of Funds - Reinstates Orders of Lower Fora. The National Commission exceeded its limited revisional jurisdiction under Section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 by calling for and relying on a bank report at the revisional stage, and the lower fora had properly appreciated evidence to establish bank liability for negligence in handling accounts with similar names.

21 Jan 2022

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by Sunil Kr. Maity (appellant) against the State Bank of India (respondent bank) and another custome...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Limitation and Maintainability Under Consumer Protection Act 1986. Complaint Barred by Limitation as Cause of Action Arose When Municipal Authorities First Demanded Higher Charges, Not Continuing, and Not Maintainable as Appellant Not a Consumer Under Section 2(1)(d) for Property Tax and Water Services Provided by Municipal Authorities.

11 Jan 2022

The appeal originated from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dated 3 December 2018, which dismissed a consumer complai...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Class Action by Homebuyers Under Section 35(1)(c) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 — Builder's Objection on Miniscule Percentage Rejected. Commonality of Interest Found in Delay in Possession and Unfair Trade Practices, Allowing Representative Complaint for All 1134 Apartment Purchasers.

17 Dec 2021

The case involves an appeal by Brigade Enterprises Limited, a builder, against an order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC)...

4 5 6 7 8

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)