Search Results for "Public servant"

76 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 76 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition Allowed Quashing Criminal Proceedings Against MSEDCL Employees for Lack of Sanction under Section 197 of CrPC. MSEDCL employees recognized as public servants, protected under Section 197 CrPC, process quashed due to lack of sanction.

MSEDCL employees challenged the issuance of process under Sections 323 and 506 IPC. The Bombay High Court ruled that they were public servants, requir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"High Court of Bombay Reviews Discharge Applications in Alleged Procurement Irregularities Case" "Two former officials challenge the rejection of their discharge applications in a corruption case involving procurement irregularities at IITM, Pune."

The High Court of Bombay reviewed the Criminal Revision Applications filed by Dr. Gufran Beig and Vipin Mali, who are accused of corruption and procur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Proceedings Against Company in INR 8 Crore Duty Evasion Case Due to Immunity Under Settlement Commission. Appellant-Company exempted from prosecution as per immunity granted by the Settlement Commission, Gujarat High Court's order overturned.

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against the Appellant-Company, accused of evading countervailing duty (CVD) to the tune of INR 8 crores...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Interception Orders in Corruption Case. Court rules interception of telephonic communication lawful in public safety and anti-corruption efforts.

The High Court of Bombay, Justice Sandeep V. Marne presided over a case where Shyamalendu Kumar Das challenged interception orders under the Indian Te...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Dismisses Applications with Costs for Misuse of Legal Process. High Court imposes costs for frivolous complaints seeking to pressurize public servants in the Jalgaon land acquisition case.

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, dismissed two criminal applications filed by Atul Ashok Mundada under Section 156(3) of the CrPC. The court u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Charges Against Krishna Bhagwan Kotak and J.M. Baxi & Co. Court Discharges Accused Due to Lack of Evidence and Absence of Public Servant Involvement.

The Bombay High Court has discharged Krishna Bhagwan Kotak and his firm, J.M. Baxi & Co., from criminal charges in a case involving alleged financ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Overturns Conviction for Use of Criminal Force by Public Servant in Corruption Case. The Supreme Court finds insufficient evidence to uphold a conviction under Section 353 IPC, leading to the acquittal in a high-profile corruption case.

The Supreme Court of India reversed the conviction of the appellant under Section 353 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which pertains to the use of cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Rules Custody Dispute: Children to be Returned to Petitioners. Judgment emphasizes adherence to legal definitions and proper adoption procedures while invalidating the Child Welfare Committee's jurisdiction over the children.

This judgment addresses petitions for habeas corpus related to the custody of minor children placed in Baal Asha Trust by the Child Welfare Committee ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Arvind Kejriwal Challenges Legality of Arrest Under PML Act: Delhi High Court Appeal. Examining Judicial Safeguards and Proportionality in Arrest Procedures

This appeal, filed by Arvind Kejriwal, challenges the legality of his arrest by the Directorate of Enforcement (DoE) under Section 19 of the Preventio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Prosecution's Case Fails: Appellant Acquitted of Bribery Charges. Inconsistencies and Lack of Evidence Lead to Appellant's Acquittal in High-Profile Bribery Case

The prosecution failed to substantiate the charge under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d)(i) and (ii) of the Act against the appellant (AO1). The evidence did n...