Supreme Court Modifies Punishment from Removal to Compulsory Retirement in Bank Disciplinary Case Due to Disproportionality. The court held that removal was too harsh as no financial loss occurred and the employee had 28 years of unblemished service, substituting it with compulsory retirement under principles of proportionality. (Paras 3.2, 6)
11 Feb 2022The dispute involved an employee of a bank who was removed from service after disciplinary proceedings initiated based on complaints, including one fr...
