Search Results for "general category"

58 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 58 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of Government Resolution on Seniority for SC/ST Promotions in Orissa Administrative Service. Catch-Up Rule Prevails Absent State Legislation Under Article 16(4A) After 85th Amendment.

The case involves a dispute over seniority between general category officers and SC/ST officers in the Orissa Administrative Service. The respondent-w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of PTI Selection by Haryana Staff Selection Commission Due to Arbitrary Change in Criteria. The selection process violated Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution as the Commission altered the marking scheme after interviews without any rational basis.

The case pertains to a batch of appeals arising from a common judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which quashed the selection of Physical T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Reserved Category Candidate Who Availed Age Relaxation: Cannot Claim General Category Seat. Age Relaxation Under Gujarat Policy Is a Relaxation in Standard, Not a Mere Concession, and Candidates Availing It Must Be Adjusted Against Reserved Posts.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Niravkumar Dilipbhai Makwana against the Gujarat Public Service Commission and others, upholding the D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Seniority Dispute Over Catch-Up Rule for Reserved Category Promotions. Consequential Seniority for Scheduled Caste Promotee Upheld as Regular Promotion Not Fortuitous.

The case involves a seniority dispute between two officers of the Government of Maharashtra: Sudhakar Baburao Nangnure (appellant, open category) and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Kerala High Court Judgment Upholding CAT Order for Inclusion in Promotion Panel. Delay and Laches Not a Bar as Representation Was Replied and Tribunal Condoned Delay.

The case involves a dispute over promotion to the post of Assistant Personnel Officer (APO) in the Southern Railway under the 30% Limited Departmental...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit and Recruitment Interval Rules for Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. Rules 8(1) and 12 of UPHJS Rules, 1975 Held Valid as Not Manifestly Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 16.

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Rules 8(1) and 12 of the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service Rules, 1975. The petitioner...