Search Results for "misconduct"

145 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 145 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Prevention of Corruption Act Case, Reinstating FIR Quashed by High Court. Preliminary Enquiry Not Mandatory Under Section 17 When Superintendent of Police Orders Investigation Based on Detailed Source Report Disclosing Cognizable Offence.

The State of Karnataka appealed against the Karnataka High Court's order quashing proceedings against a public servant for offences under the Preventi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal in Pension Dispute Under Bipartite Settlement and Pension Regulations. Employee Removed for Misconduct Entitled to Pension as Appellate Order Granting Terminal Benefits Attained Finality and He Completed Minimum Pensionable Service.

The dispute arose from the removal of an employee from service by United Commercial Bank following a disciplinary enquiry that found him guilty of rio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Chargesheet Against Tehsildar in Land Settlement Case, Citing Unexplained Delay and Lack of Malafide. Inordinate Delay and Absence of Extraneous Influence Bar Disciplinary Proceedings Against Quasi-Judicial Officers

Major Acts and Provisions: Judges Protection Act, 1985 (JPA 1985) – Para 4 Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1959 – Section 57(2) �...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Service Dismissal Case, Reinstating Dismissal Order Quashed by High Court. The Court Held That Approval of Charge-Sheet by Competent Authority at Issuance Stage Is Not Mandatory If Initiation of Proceedings Was Approved, Under Civil Services Rules and Precedents.

The dispute arose from the dismissal of a civil service officer in Jharkhand following disciplinary proceedings for misconduct involving dishonesty, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cross-FIR Case Between Advocates Due to Abuse of Process and Apology. Second FIR Registered as Counterblast to First FIR Was Deemed an Abuse of Law Under Sections 294(b), 323, and 506(1) of Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Quashed to End Protracted Litigation.

The appeal arose from a dispute between two advocates practising in Kodaikanal, leading to cross-FIRs registered in December 2017. The first appellant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Rules on Advocate Appearances and Vakalatnama Compliance in Court Proceedings. Supreme Court Bars Unauthorized Advocate Appearances, Reinforces Accountability in Legal Practice

The Supreme Court, in its judgment dated 20.09.2024, had directed that only authorized advocates could mark their appearances in court, and the Advoca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in International Arbitration Agreements. Supreme Court Rules on Applicability of Indian Law and Jurisdiction in Cross-Border Arbitration Disputes

Governing Law of Arbitration Agreement: The Court applied the three-step test from Sulamérica Cia Nacional De Seguros S.A. v. Enesa Engenharia S.A....