Search Results for "Code of Civil Procedure"

226 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 226 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Executing Court failed to exercise jurisdiction under Section 51 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – High Court quashed the impugned order and remanded the matter for proper execution of the decree.

The Executing Court has a duty to exercise jurisdiction under Section 51 CPC to determine all questions relating to decree execution, including the id...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Executing Court failed to exercise jurisdiction under Section 51 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 – High Court quashed the impugned order and remanded the matter for proper execution of the decree.

The Executing Court has a duty to exercise jurisdiction under Section 51 CPC to determine all questions relating to decree execution, including the id...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Acquisition Of Land – Right To Fair Compensation – Illegality Of Forced TDR/FSI Grant – Applicability Of The Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 And The Right To Fair Compensation And Transparency In Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation And Resettlement Act, 2013

The acquisition must follow statutory requirements – In the absence of an agreement for TDR/FSI, monetary compensation under the 2013 Act is mandato...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Set Aside the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal’s (DRAT) Order — Directs DRAT to Decide Appeals on Merits. Revisiting the Scope of Appellate Authority and Jurisdiction — Emphasis on Avoiding Routine Remands — Upholding Judicial Efficiency and Finality of Decisions

The DRAT, as an appellate authority, has the duty to decide all issues based on the material available on record. Routine and unjustified remands del...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Reinstatement of Terminated Teacher — Vitiated Inquiry Proceedings — Real Likelihood of Bias — Full Back Wages Awarded — Application of Principles of Natural Justice

High Court upheld the Tribunal’s decision — Confirmed reinstatement of Respondent No.1 — Directed payment of full back wages — Found the inqui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bar on Testamentary Disposition of Tenanted Land – Protection of Possession under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act – Appreciation of Oral and Documentary Evidence – Injunction and Declaration of Title – Relevance of Admissions in Evidence

Statutory Bar under Section 43 Upheld – Held that testamentary disposition of tenanted land was barred, and the Will relied upon by the defendants w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarified Permanent Alimony Covers All Maintenance Claims – No Further Dues Payable. Miscellaneous Application Seeking Additional Maintenance Rejected – Rs. 50 Lakh Permanent Alimony Held as Full and Final Settlement

The Supreme Court dismissed the Miscellaneous Application, holding that all disputes, including maintenance, were finally settled by its previous judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Civil Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession — Res Judicata, Limitation, and Representative Suit Discussed — Supreme Court Set Aside High Court’s Decree and Dismissed the Suit.

A suit filed in a representative capacity cannot override the conclusive effect of a decree already attained finality, and res judicata shall bar any ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Review Jurisdiction, Suppression of Evidence, and Award of Back Wages. Supreme Court Upholds Review Jurisdiction, Condemns Suppression of Evidence, and Modifies Back Wages Award.

The Supreme Court held that MSRTC was guilty of suggestio falsi and suppresio veri by not disclosing its pleadings before the MACT to the Labour Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Contract Law – Unilateral Mistake – Encashment of Bank Guarantee – Proportionality – Judicial Review – Equity – Relief Granted

The Supreme Court found the Appellant’s error to be apparent and self-evident, warranting equitable relief. (Para 16) BRO’s refusal to acknowledg...