Search Results for "Investments"

93 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 93 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Order in Tender Dispute Involving Foreign Sovereign Funding. High Court Erred in Interfering with Technical Bid Rejection Under Article 226 as Project Funded by Japanese Loan with Non-Negotiable Terms Under Memorandum of Understanding.

The dispute arose from a tender process for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad High Speed Rail Project, where the National High Speed Rail Corporation Limited (NHSR...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Bond Redemption Dispute, Upholding Defendant's Compliance with RBI Directives. Interest on Delayed Payment Not Payable Due to Regulatory Embargo and Pending Liquidation Proceedings Under Companies Act, 1956.

The dispute arose from a suit filed by M/s. SIBCO Investment Pvt Ltd against Small Industries Development Bank of India seeking interest on alleged be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Money Suit Recovery Case — High Court Order for Refund of Anticipatory Bail Amount Set Aside. Full and Final Settlement Not Proved by Oral Evidence Alone When Banking Transactions Admitted.

The appellant, Anita Rani, filed two money suits against the respondents for recovery of amounts allegedly lent or misappropriated. The first suit sou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Project Proponent's Environmental Clearance in Construction Dispute Under Amended EIA Regime. Environmental Clearance Granted by Local Authority Valid as Per Notification Dated 9.12.2016, Protecting Existing Constructions but Requiring Fresh Clearance for Future Expansion.

The dispute centered on the validity of an Environmental Clearance (EC) obtained by a project proponent for a construction project in Maharashtra. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partnership Dispute Over Share Entitlement. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Capital Contribution of Rs.50,00,000 as per Partnership Deed Dated 30.10.1992, Thus Entitled Only to 10% Share in Profits and Losses Until Expulsion on 18.6.2004.

The dispute originated from a partnership firm, M/s Selwel Combines, reconstituted in 1992 with plaintiff No.1 inducted as a partner under a deed stip...